ArticleCureus2024
Assessment of the Length of the Pedicle of the Anterolateral Thigh Flap.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose To estimate the length of the pedicle of the anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) and to assess how this length corresponds with the distances between the anatomical landmarks. Methods The study group consisted of patients who underwent computed tomography angiograms ranging minimally from the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) superiorly and tibia inferiorly. In the study we included 44 patients. In the axial window we identified single scans with (1) ASIS, (2) the apex of the greater trochanter, (3) the origin of the descending branch of the lateral femoral circumflex artery (LFCA), (4) the superolateral corner of the patella, (5) knee joint gap. Knowing the slice thickness in every patient and the difference in scan number we measured (A)-the distance between the scan (1) and the scan (4). This distance (A) represented the length of the line connecting ASIS and the superolateral corner of the patella (AP line). Next, we identified (6) the midpoint of the distance (A). Next we measured (B)-the distance between the scan (2) and the scan (5) and (C)-the distance between the scan (3) and the midpoint of the AP line (6). Results Mean distances between the scans were: (A) 45.34 cm (SD=4.14), (B) 43.12 cm (SD=4.08), (C) 11.69 cm (SD=1.62). There was low positive correlation between the distance (A) and the distance (C) (r
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.