Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38533124›Full record

ArticleData in brief2024

Sugarcane leaf dataset: A dataset for disease detection and classification for machine learning applications.

Sandip Thite, Yogesh Suryawanshi, Kailas Patil, Prawit Chumchu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dataset ofData in brief · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sandip ThiteVishwakarma University, Pune, India.
Yogesh SuryawanshiVishwakarma University, Pune, India.
Kailas PatilVishwakarma University, Pune, India.
Prawit ChumchuKasetsart University, Sriracha, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sugarcane, a vital crop for the global sugar industry, is susceptible to various diseases that significantly impact its yield and quality. Accurate and timely disease detection is crucial for effective management and prevention strategies. We persent the "Sugarcane Leaf Dataset" consisting of 6748 high-resolution leaf images classified into nine disease categories, a healthy leaves category, and a dried leaves category. The dataset covers diseases such as smut, yellow leaf disease, pokkah boeng, mosale, grassy shoot, brown spot, brown rust, banded cholorsis, and sett rot. The dataset's potential for reuse is significant. The provided dataset serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners interested in developing machine learning algorithms for disease detection and classification in sugarcane leaves. By leveraging this dataset, various machine learning techniques can be applied, including deep learning, feature extraction, and pattern recognition, to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of automated sugarcane disease identification systems. The open availability of this dataset encourages collaboration within the scientific community, expediting research on disease control strategies and improving sugarcane production. By leveraging the "Sugarcane Leaf Dataset," we can advance disease detection, monitoring, and management in sugarcane cultivation, leading to enhanced agricultural practices and higher crop yields.

Indexed as

ClassificationDatasetDeep learningDisease detectionImage analysisLeaf diseasesMachine learningSugarcane

Identifiers

PMID38533124
PMCPMC10964057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.