Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38533112›Full record

ArticleData in brief2024

A simultaneous EEG-fNIRS dataset of the visual cognitive motivation study in healthy adults.

Tustanah Phukhachee, Thanate Angsuwatanakul, Keiji Iramina, Boonserm Kaewkamnerdpong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tustanah PhukhacheeComputer Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand.
Thanate AngsuwatanakulCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani 12000, Thailand.
Keiji IraminaGraduate School of Systems Life Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan.
Boonserm KaewkamnerdpongBiological Engineering Program, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article described a publicly available dataset of the visual cognitive motivation study in healthy adults. To gain an in-depth understanding and insights into motivation, Electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) were measured simultaneously at shared locations while participants performed a visual cognitive motivation task. The participants' choices in the cognitive motivation task were recorded. The effects of their motivation were identified in the recognition test afterward. This dataset comprised EEG and fNIRS data from sixteen healthy adults (age: 21- 37 years; 14 males and 2 females) during the cognitive motivation task with visual scenic stimuli. In addition, the motivation and the corresponding motivation effect were also provided. This dataset provides understanding and analyzing opportunities for the process of attention and decision while the brain undergoes an induced motivated state and its effect on the recognition performance.

Indexed as

Educational neuroscienceElectroencephalographyFunctional near-infrared spectroscopyIntrinsic motivationMemoryVisual cognitive motivation task

Identifiers

PMID38533112
PMCPMC10964074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.