ArticleHeliyon2024
Image quality of abdominal photon-counting CT with reduced contrast media dose: Evaluation of reduced contrast media protocols during the COVID19 pandemic supply shortage.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Photon-counting CT in head and neck radiology: bridging detector physics and clinical applications.European radiology · 2026Review
- Photon counting detector CT contrast agent-reduced transcatheter aortic valve reconstruction planning: a comparative study.European radiology · 2026Article
- A Practical Rule-of-Thumb to Adapt Contrast Media Dose in Photon-counting Detector CT: The 10-to-5 Rule.Investigative radiology · 2026Article
- Contrast medium dose optimization in the era of multi-energy CT.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Potential of photon-counting detector CT technology for contrast medium reduction in portal venous phase thoracoabdominal CT.European radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: Aim of this study was to assess the impact of contrast media dose (CMD) reduction on diagnostic quality of photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT). Methods: CT scans of the abdominal region with differing CMD acquired in portal venous phase on a PCD-CT were included and compared to EID-CT scans. Diagnostic quality and contrast intensity were rated. Additionally, readers had to assign the scans to reduced or regular CMD. Regions-of-interest (ROIs) were placed in defined segments of portal vein, inferior vena cava, liver, spleen, kidneys, abdominal aorta and muscular tissue. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Results: Overall 158 CT scans performed on a PCD-CT and 68 examinations on an EID-CT were analyzed. Overall diagnostic quality showed no significant differences for PCD-CT with standard CMD which scored a median 5 (IQR:5-5) and PCD-CT with 70% CMD scoring 5 (4-5). (For PCD-CT, 71.69% of the examinations with reduced CMD were assigned to regular CMD by the readers, for EID-CT 9.09%. Averaged for all measurements SNR for 50% CMD was reduced by 19% in PCD-CT (EID-CT 34%) and CNR by 48% (EID-CT 56%). Virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) Conclusions: Diagnostic interpretability of PCD-CT examinations with reduction of up to 50% CMD is maintained. PCD-CT deducted scans especially with 70% CMD were often not recognized as CMD reduced scans. Compared to EID-CT less decline in SNR and CNR is observed for CMD reduced PCD-CT images. Employing VMI
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.