ReviewHeliyon2024
Application of the superior mesenteric artery-first approach in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: A literature review.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of D3 lymph node dissection extent on postoperative bowel function and nutritional status in right-sided colon cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Trial
- In Situ Anterior Approach to Dissect the Superior Mesenteric Artery in Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Step-by-Step Technique and Video.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Preoperative systemic inflammatory response index as a prognostic marker for distal cholangiocarcinoma after pancreatoduodenectomy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Early postoperative fever as a predictor of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center retrospective observational study.BMC surgery · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a complicated surgical procedure that has recently been performed safely. A superior mesenteric artery (SMA)-first approach can allow complete mesopancreas resection, maximizing surgical margins and R0 resection rates. Therefore, the SMA-first approach is recommended. This review is a literature summary of recent updates of the SMA approaches for LPD and informs clinical practice of the advantages of its various approach. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed on the PubMed (MEDLINE) database using truncated word searches and medical subject headings to identify all pertinent published studies. Results: After searching PubMed, 303 studies were identified and reviewed, of which 25 described the SMA-first approach, including the anterior, posterior, right, and left approaches, fully described in 5, 6, 13, and 6 articles, respectively. Conclusions: The SMA-first approach is the standard surgical technique for LPD. This review summarized each SMA-first approach's distinct advantages and indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.