ReviewWorld journal of pediatric surgery2024
Role of practice standardization in outcome optimization for CDH.
Review in World journal of pediatric surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Training programs for families of children on home peritoneal dialysis: a scoping review.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Inconsistencies in Clinical Reporting of Nasopharyngoscopy for Evaluating Velopharyngeal Closure: A Multisite Study.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026Article
- The Evolving Role of Radiation Therapy Technologists in Head and Neck Cancer: A Narrative Review and Operational Framework.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Guidelines for the Medical Management of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Implications for Resource-limited Settings.Indian pediatrics · 2026Review
- Fecal microbiota transplant and its usefulness in hepatic disorders: a systematic review.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Perceptions of healthcare quality indicators by anesthesiologists in intensive care departments in Ukraine.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Neonatal mortality of live births with congenital diaphragmatic hernia in São Paulo State, Brazil: Failure of care?Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2025Article
- Clinical consensus statements on Marsha Nasya - A feasibility study towards developing clinical practice guidelines of therapeutic procedures in Ayurveda.Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standardization of care seeks to improve patient outcomes and healthcare delivery by reducing unwanted variations in care as well as promoting the efficient and effective use of healthcare resources. There are many types of standardization, with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), based on a stringent assessment of evidence and expert consensus, being the hallmark of high-quality care. This article outlines the history of CPGs, their benefits and shortcomings, with a specific focus on standardization efforts as it relates to congenital diaphragmatic hernia management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.