ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2024
The effect of "clinical virtual round" on clinical self-efficacy among midwifery students.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development, implementation, and evaluation of an Interprofessional education program in maternity clinical practice for medical interns and undergraduate midwifery students.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- The effect of the application of feedback on second-stage labor companion skills and Objective Structured Clinical Examination results of associate degree midwifery students.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- Experiences of pregnant women, midwifery students, and their instructors from implementing a clinical leadership and mentorship program in labor and delivery wards.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne of the methods of clinical education is clinical rounds which makes students more skilled in the comprehensive care of patients. since midwifery students are faced with low-risk and high-risk cases of mothers during the perinatal period, Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to their clinical self-efficacy. The aim of this study was to determine. The effect of "clinical virtual round" on clinical self-efficacy among midwifery students. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study was experimental with the control group design. The subjects were randomly divided into the intervention (n = 30) and control (n = 30) groups. two groups received clinical virtual round and report back model (respectively). subjects in both groups responded to the 20-item clinical self-efficacy Questionnaire, before and after the intervention. Data were analyzed with paired
resultsThe baseline mean ± SD scores for clinical self-efficacy in interventional and control groups were 10.1 ± 1.32, and 10.1 ± 3.05 respectively (
conclusionAccording to this study's results, it is recommended that clinical virtual rounds can be increasing clinical self-efficacy among midwifery students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.