ArticleAEM education and training2024
Better together: A multistakeholder approach to developing specialty-wide entrustable professional activities in emergency medicine.
Article in AEM education and training, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conceptualising and assessing interdependent clinical performances: Early insights from emergency medicine and paediatric faculty.Medical education · 2026Article
- Aligning training with clinical reality: linking case-mix and self-reported confidence to entrustable professional activities in physician-staffed EMS.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Preparing Emergency Medicine Residents for the Certifying Exam: A Pilot Study of a Longitudinal Simulation-Based Assessment Program.AEM education and training · 2026Article
- Outcomes of the SAEM Competency-Based Medical Education Consensus Conference: Challenges and Opportunities in Implementing CBME.AEM education and training · 2026Review
- Operationalizing Competency-based Medical Education Within Clinical Competency Committees.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Model Resuscitation Leadership Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Residents: Modified Delphi Study.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Procedural Skills and Emergency Medicine Common Program Requirements: It's Time to Address Skill Decay.AEM education and training · 2025Article
- Coaching in GME: Lessons Learned From 3 Unique Coaching Programs.Journal of graduate medical education · 2025Article
- Implementing the 5 Core Components of Competency-Based Medical Education in US Emergency Medicine Residency Programs.Journal of graduate medical education · 2025Article
- Entrustable professional activity use in emergency medicine: A scoping review.AEM education and training · 2025Article
- A practical primer on clinical supervision of learners in the emergency department.AEM education and training · 2025Review
- Better together: A multistakeholder approach to developing specialty-wide entrustable professional activities in emergency medicine.AEM education and training · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are a widely used framework for curriculum and assessment, yet the variability in emergency medicine (EM) training programs mandates the development of EPAs that meet the needs of the specialty as a whole. This requires eliciting and incorporating the perspectives of multiple stakeholders (i.e., faculty, residents, and patients) in the development of EPAs. Without a shared understanding of what a resident must be able to do upon graduation, we run the risk of advancing ill-prepared residents that may provide inconsistent care. Methods: In an effort to address these challenges, beginning in February 2020, the authors assembled an advisory board of 25 EM faculty to draft and reach consensus on a final list of EPAs that can be used across all training programs within the specialty of EM. Using modified Delphi methodology, the authors came to consensus on an initial list of 22 EPAs. The authors presented these EPAs to faculty supervisors, residents, and patients for refinement. The authors collated and analyzed feedback from focus groups of residents and patients using thematic analysis. The EPAs were subsequently refined based on this feedback. Results: Stakeholders in EM residency training endorsed a final revised list of 22 EPAs. Stakeholder focus groups highlighted two main thematic considerations that helped shape the finalized list of EM EPAs: attention to the meaningful nuances of EPA language and contextualizing the EPAs and viewing them developmentally. Conclusions: To foreground all key stakeholders within the EPA process for EM, the authors chose within the development process to draft; come to consensus; and refine EPAs for EM in collaboration with relevant faculty, patient, and resident stakeholders. Each stakeholder group contributed meaningfully to the content and intended implementation of the EPAs. This process may serve as a model for others in developing stakeholder-responsive EPAs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.