ArticleJournal of microscopy2024
Creating and troubleshooting microscopy analysis workflows: Common challenges and common solutions.
Article in Journal of microscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Semi-automated image acquisition and analyses for broad users utilizing macro keyboards.Microscopy (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- From cells to pixels: A decision tree for designing bioimage analysis pipelines.Journal of microscopy · 2025Article
- Tissue Cytometry Assay with Nuclear Segmentation for Quantifying NETotic Cells in Neutrophils Stimulated by Spermatozoa in Veterinary Species.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Microscopy methods for the in vivo study of nanoscale nuclear organization.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025Review
- The dry lab microscopist or prompt microscopist: do we need them?Biophysical reviews · 2024Review
- The crucial role of bioimage analysts in scientific research and publication.Journal of cell science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
As microscopy diversifies and becomes ever more complex, the problem of quantification of microscopy images has emerged as a major roadblock for many researchers. All researchers must face certain challenges in turning microscopy images into answers, independent of their scientific question and the images they have generated. Challenges may arise at many stages throughout the analysis process, including handling of the image files, image pre-processing, object finding, or measurement, and statistical analysis. While the exact solution required for each obstacle will be problem-specific, by keeping analysis in mind, optimizing data quality, understanding tools and tradeoffs, breaking workflows and data sets into chunks, talking to experts, and thoroughly documenting what has been done, analysts at any experience level can learn to overcome these challenges and create better and easier image analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.