Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38532514›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2024

Evaluation of veteran community care outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective pilot cohort.

Jake L Cotton, Adom Netsanet, Alejandro Suarez-Pierre, Danielle Abbitt, Teresa S Jones, Jessica Y Rove, Edward L Jones

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jake L CottonDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 East 17th Avenue, 6111, 80045, Room, Aurora, CO, USA. Jake.Cotton@cuanschutz.edu.
Adom NetsanetDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 East 17th Avenue, 6111, 80045, Room, Aurora, CO, USA.
Alejandro Suarez-PierreDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 East 17th Avenue, 6111, 80045, Room, Aurora, CO, USA.
Danielle AbbittDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 East 17th Avenue, 6111, 80045, Room, Aurora, CO, USA.
Teresa S JonesDepartment of Surgery, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jessica Y RoveDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Edward L JonesDepartment of Surgery, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For Veterans who cannot be seen in a timely fashion or must travel long distances to be seen, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) offers funded care in the community. The use of this program has rapidly increased; however, there have been no systematic evaluations of surgery specific metrics such as perioperative complications, mortality and timeliness of care. To evaluate this in cardiac surgery patients, we compared veterans undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in the community to those remaining within the VHA. We identified 78 patients during calendar year 2018 meeting inclusion criteria. 41 underwent surgery in the community versus 37 in the VHA. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics including age, sex, race, ethnicity, comorbidities and surgical risk scores. With regard to perioperative outcomes, veterans who underwent surgery within the VHA had lower infection rates (17% vs. 0%, p = 0.008) and 30-day emergency department utilization (22% vs. 5%, p = 0.04). A longer median postoperative inpatient stay was also seen within the VHA (8 days vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). These findings suggest that the VHA may better serve Veterans and prevent adverse events after CABG, at the expense of prolonged hospitalization. More study is needed to validate the findings of this pilot study.

Indexed as

VeteransCoronary Artery BypassHumansPilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsCoronary artery bypassPatient outcome assessmentVeterans healthVHA

Identifiers

PMID38532514
PMCPMC10964589
OpenAlexW4393182566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.