Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38532414›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2024

Combining public datasets for automated tooth assessment in panoramic radiographs.

Niels van Nistelrooij, Khalid El Ghoul, Tong Xi, Anindo Saha, Steven Kempers, Max Cenci, Bas Loomans, Tabea Flügge, Bram van Ginneken, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Niels van NistelrooijDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Postal Number 590, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
Khalid El GhoulDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Tong XiDepartment of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands.
Anindo SahaDepartment of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands.
Steven KempersDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Postal Number 590, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
Max CenciDepartment of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Center, Ph. Van Leydenlaan 25, Nijmegen, 6525 EX, The Netherlands.
Bas LoomansDepartment of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Center, Ph. Van Leydenlaan 25, Nijmegen, 6525 EX, The Netherlands.
Tabea FlüggeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany. tabea.fluegge@charite.de.
Bram van GinnekenDepartment of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands.
Shankeeth VinayahalingamDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Postal Number 590, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePanoramic radiographs (PRs) provide a comprehensive view of the oral and maxillofacial region and are used routinely to assess dental and osseous pathologies. Artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to improve the diagnostic accuracy of PRs compared to bitewings and periapical radiographs. This study aimed to evaluate the advantages and challenges of using publicly available datasets in dental AI research, focusing on solving the novel task of predicting tooth segmentations, FDI numbers, and tooth diagnoses, simultaneously. MATERIALS AND

methodsDatasets from the OdontoAI platform (tooth instance segmentations) and the DENTEX challenge (tooth bounding boxes with associated diagnoses) were combined to develop a two-stage AI model. The first stage implemented tooth instance segmentation with FDI numbering and extracted regions of interest around each tooth segmentation, whereafter the second stage implemented multi-label classification to detect dental caries, impacted teeth, and periapical lesions in PRs. The performance of the automated tooth segmentation algorithm was evaluated using a free-response receiver-operating-characteristics (FROC) curve and mean average precision (mAP) metrics. The diagnostic accuracy of detection and classification of dental pathology was evaluated with ROC curves and F1 and AUC metrics.

resultsThe two-stage AI model achieved high accuracy in tooth segmentations with a FROC score of 0.988 and a mAP of 0.848. High accuracy was also achieved in the diagnostic classification of impacted teeth (F1 = 0.901, AUC = 0.996), whereas moderate accuracy was achieved in the diagnostic classification of deep caries (F1 = 0.683, AUC = 0.960), early caries (F1 = 0.662, AUC = 0.881), and periapical lesions (F1 = 0.603, AUC = 0.974). The model's performance correlated positively with the quality of annotations in the used public datasets. Selected samples from the DENTEX dataset revealed cases of missing (false-negative) and incorrect (false-positive) diagnoses, which negatively influenced the performance of the AI model.

conclusionsThe use and pooling of public datasets in dental AI research can significantly accelerate the development of new AI models and enable fast exploration of novel tasks. However, standardized quality assurance is essential before using the datasets to ensure reliable outcomes and limit potential biases.

Indexed as

Dental CariesToothTooth, ImpactedArtificial IntelligenceBone and BonesHumansRadiography, PanoramicArtificial intelligenceDiagnostic classificationPanoramic radiographPublic datasetsTooth segmentation

Identifiers

PMID38532414
PMCPMC10964594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.