Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38532409›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2024

Exploring risk factors of pelvic organ prolapse at eastern of Democratic Republic of Congo: a case-control study.

Eloge Ilunga-Mbaya, Denis Mukwege, Renaud De Tayrac, Branly Mbunga, Raha Maroyi, Mukanire Ntakwinja, Mushengezi Amani Dieudonné Sengeyi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eloge Ilunga-MbayaFaculty of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. elogeilungambaya@yahoo.fr.
Denis MukwegeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Université Evangélique en Afrique, Panzi Hospital, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Renaud De TayracDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Montpellier, Nîmes University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
Branly MbungaKinshasa School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Raha MaroyiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Université Evangélique en Afrique, Panzi Hospital, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Mukanire NtakwinjaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Université Evangélique en Afrique, Panzi Hospital, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Mushengezi Amani Dieudonné SengeyiFaculty of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Université Evangélique en Afrique · CDUniversity of Kinshasa · CDUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPelvic organ prolapse is a common debilitating condition worldwide. Despite surgical treatment, its recurrence can reach up to 30%. It has multiple risk factors, some of which are particular for a low-resource settings. The identification these factors would help to devise risk models allowing the development of prevention policies. The objective of this study was to explore risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse in a population in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

methodsThis was an unmatched case-control study conducted between January 2021 and January 2022. The sample size was estimated to be a total of 434 women (217 with prolapse as cases and 217 without prolapse as controls). Data comparisons were made using the Chi-Square and Student T tests. Binary and multivariate logistic regressions were used to determine associated factors. A p < 0.05 was considered significant.

resultsVariables identified as definitive predictors of pelvic organ prolapse included low BMI (aOR 2.991; CI 1.419-6.307; p = 0.004), home birth (aOR 6.102; CI 3.526-10.561; p < 0.001), family history of POP (aOR 2.085; CI 1.107-3.924; p = 0.023), history of birth without an episiotomy (aOR 3.504; CI 2.031-6.048; p = 0), height ≤ 150 cm (aOR 5.328; CI 2.942-9.648; p < 0.001) and history of giving birth to a macrosomic baby (aOR 1.929; IC 1.121-3.321; p = 0.018).

conclusionsThis study identified that Body Mass Index and birth-related factors are definitive predictors of pelvic organ prolapse in a low-resource setting. These factors are potentially modifiable and should be targeted in any future pelvic organ prolapse prevention policy. Additionally, there seems to be a genetic predisposition for prolapse, which warrants further assessment in specifically designed large scale studies.

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapseCase-Control StudiesDemocratic Republic of the CongoEpisiotomyFemaleHumansPregnancyRisk FactorsLow-income countriesPelvic organ prolapseRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID38532409
PMCPMC10964682
OpenAlexW4393202171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.