Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38532396›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2024

Retinal injury from a laser skin resurfacing device during medical tourism: a public health concern.

Lester H Lambert, Brett L Tompkins, Ian C Uber, Kapil G Kapoor, David J Ramsey

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Case Series of Retinal Damage Caused by Laser Pointer.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lester H LambertDepartment of Ophthalmology, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, 620 John Paul Jones Cir, 23708, Portsmouth, VA, USA. lester.h.lambert2.mil@health.mil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5504-812X
Brett L TompkinsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, 620 John Paul Jones Cir, 23708, Portsmouth, VA, USA.
Ian C UberDepartment of Ophthalmology, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, 620 John Paul Jones Cir, 23708, Portsmouth, VA, USA.
Kapil G KapoorWagner Kapoor Institute, 1800 Republic Road, Suite 102, 23454, Virginia Beach, VA, USA.
David J RamseyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tufts University School of Medicine, 02111, Boston, MA, USA.
Naval Medical Center Portsmouth · USTufts University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaser skin resurfacing is a popular cosmetic procedure for noninvasive skin rejuvenation. Since health insurance plans often do not cover these types of procedures, patients often pay out of pocket. Consequently, there is an incentive to go abroad, where prices are more affordable. However, practitioners in destination countries may lack rigorous training on laser safety, regulatory oversight, or licensing, especially on devices used for "cosmetic" procedures. In certain cases, this can lead to tragic outcomes, especially when underqualified practitioners operate medical-grade laser devices. CASE PRESENTATION: A 29-year-old woman suffered a retinal burn from a handheld Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser pulse device used to perform skin resurfacing treatment at a medical spa in Vietnam. The patient was not adequately informed about the potential risk to her vision and was not provided with any eye protection. A momentary, unintended laser exposure to the patient's right eye led to irreversible vision loss due to a macular burn. This incident caused immediate pain, followed by the sudden appearance of floaters, along with a retinal and vitreous hemorrhage. Despite treatment with off-label bevacizumab for the development of a choroidal neovascular membrane, vision remained at the level of counting fingers because of the presence of the macular scar.

conclusionWhen utilizing laser-based devices, it is crucial to employ safety measures, such as the wearing of safety goggles or the use of eye shields to protect ocular tissues from potential damage. The growing availability of cosmetic laser devices presents a substantial public health risk, because numerous operators lack adequate training in essential safety standards, or they neglect to follow them. Furthermore, patients seeking services abroad are subject to the regulatory practices of the destination country, which may not always enforce the requisite safety standards. Further research is needed to determine regional and global incidence of laser-related injuries to help direct educational and regulatory efforts.

Indexed as

Eye InjuriesLasers, Solid-StateLaser TherapyMedical TourismAdultFemaleHumansPublic HealthChorioretinal scarLaser injuryNeovascular membraneRetinaSafetyVitreomacular traction

Identifiers

PMID38532396
PMCPMC10964681
OpenAlexW4393192702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.