Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38532328›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2024

Tools to measure barriers to medication management capacity in older adults: a scoping review.

Bincy Baby, Annette McKinnon, Kirk Patterson, Hawa Patel, Rishabh Sharma, Caitlin Carter, Ryan Griffin, Catherine Burns, Feng Chang, Sara Jt Guilcher and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Bincy BabySchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Annette McKinnonPatient Advisor's Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kirk PattersonPatient Advisor's Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hawa PatelSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Rishabh SharmaSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Caitlin CarterSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Ryan GriffinNational Research Council Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Catherine BurnsFaculty of Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Feng ChangSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Sara Jt GuilcherLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Linda LeeDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Sara Abu FadalehSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Tejal PatelSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada. t5patel@uwaterloo.ca.
University of Waterloo · CAOntario Stroke Network · CAMcMaster University · CANational Research Council Canada · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

National Research Council, Canada AiP-205-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication management capacity is a crucial component of medication adherence, particularly among older adults. Various factors, including physical abilities, cognitive functions, sensory capabilities, motivational, and environmental factors, influence older adults' ability to manage medications. It is, therefore, crucial to identify appropriate tools that allow clinicians to determine which factors may impact medication management capacity and, consequently, nonadherence to medications. PURPOSE: 1)To identify tools that measure physical, cognitive, sensory (vision, hearing, touch), motivational, and environmental barriers to medication self-management in older adults, and 2) to understand the extent to which these tools assess various barriers.

methodsThe scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. In June 2022, the relevant literature was identified by searching PubMed (MEDLINE), Ovid Embase, Ovid IPA, EBSCOhost CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, and Scopus. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In total, 7235 studies were identified. Following the removal of duplicates, 4607 articles were screened by title and abstract, of which 4253 did not meet the inclusion criteria. Three reviewers reviewed the full texts of the remaining 354 articles; among them, 41 articles, 4 theses and 1 conference abstract met the inclusion criteria. From the included studies, 44 tools were identified that measured a combination of physical, cognitive, sensory, motivational, and environmental barriers (n=19) or only cognition (n=13), vision (n=5), environmental factors (n=3), auditory (n=1), and motivational factors (n=1). The review also examined the psychometric properties of the identified tools and found that most of them had reported validity and reliability data. Several tools have demonstrated promise in assessing a combination of barriers with validity and reliability. These tools include the Self-Medication Assessment Tool (SMAT), ManageMed Screening (MMS), Self-Medication Risk Assessment Tool (RAT), HOME-Rx revised, and Medication Management Ability Assessment (MMAA).

conclusionThis scoping review identified 44 validated tools to measure various challenges that older adults encounter with medication management. However, no tool measures all five barriers (physical, cognitive, sensory, motivational, and environmental) to medication-taking at home. Therefore, utilizing a combination of tools would be most appropriate to measure these different aspects comprehensively. Further research is needed to develop a new comprehensive tool that simultaneously measures various barriers to medication self-management.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAgedHumansMotivationSelf-ManagementAdherenceBarriersMedication managementOlder adultsSelf-management

Identifiers

PMID38532328
PMCPMC10967066
OpenAlexW4393222190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.