Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38532311›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2024

Investigation of the morphological, physiological, biochemical, and catabolic characteristics and gene expression under drought stress in tolerant and sensitive genotypes of wild barley [Hordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneum (K. Koch) Asch. & Graebn.].

Hooman Shirvani, Ali Ashraf Mehrabi, Mohsen Farshadfar, Hooshmand Safari, Ali Arminian, Foad Fatehi, Alireza Pouraboughadareh, Peter Poczai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hooman ShirvaniDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran.
Ali Ashraf MehrabiDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran. amehrabi@shahed.ac.ir.
Mohsen FarshadfarForests and Rangelands Research Department, Agricultural Research and Training Center and Kermanshah Province, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Kermanshah, Iran.
Hooshmand SafariForests and Rangelands Research Department, Agricultural Research and Training Center and Kermanshah Province, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Kermanshah, Iran.
Ali ArminianDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran.
Foad FatehiDepartment of Agriculture, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza PouraboughadarehSeed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran. a.poraboghadareh@gmail.com.
Peter PoczaiBotany and Mycology Unit, Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. peter.poczai@helsinki.fi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBarley (H. vulgare L.) is an important cereal crop cultivated across various climates globally. Barley and its ancestor (H. vulgare subsp. spontaneum) are an economically valuable model for genetic research and improvement. Drought, among various abiotic stresses, is a substantial threat to agriculture due to its unpredictable nature and significant impact on crop yield.

resultsThis study was conducted in both greenhouse and laboratory settings. Prior to the study, wild barley accessions were pre-selected based on their sensitivity or tolerance to drought as determined from fieldwork in the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 cropping seasons. The effects of three levels of drought stress were evaluated (control, 90-95% field capacity [FC]; mild stress, 50-55% FC; and severe stress, 25-30% FC). Several parameters were assessed, including seedling and root growth, enzymatic activity (CAT, SOD, POD), soluble protein levels, chlorophyll content, carotenoids, abaxial and adaxial stomatal density and dimensions, and relative gene expression of Dhn1, SOD, POD, and CAT. Drought stress significantly increased enzyme activities, especially at 25-30% FC, and more in the tolerant genotype. On the other hand, sensitive genotypes showed a notable increase in stomatal density. Under drought stress, there was a general decline in seedling and root growth, protein content, chlorophyll and carotenoids, and stomatal dimensions. Importantly, gene expression analysis revealed that Dhn1, SOD, POD, and CAT were upregulated under drought, with the highest expression levels observed in the drought-tolerant genotype under severe stress conditions (25-30% FC).

conclusionsOur investigation highlights the distinct morphological, physiological, biochemical, and gene-expression profiles of drought-resistant and drought-sensitive wild barley genotypes under varying degrees of drought.

Indexed as

HordeumCarotenoidsChlorophyllDroughtsGene ExpressionGenotypeStress, PhysiologicalSuperoxide DismutaseCarotenoidsChlorophyllSuperoxide DismutaseDrought stressGene expressionHordeum vulgareStomatal analysis

Identifiers

PMID38532311
PMCPMC10964521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.