ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2024
Fertility preservation in pediatric solid tumors: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.
Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The feasibility of ovarian tissue cryopreservation in selected females after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Long-term endocrine and testicular outcomes in male survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Beyond Survival: Addressing Pediatric Oncofertility Risk, Preservation Methods, and Care Disparities.Pediatric annals · 2025Review
- From Survival to Parenthood: The Fertility Journey After Childhood Cancer.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Targeting Pathways in Neuroblastoma: Advances in Treatment Strategies and Clinical Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Fertility preservation in pediatric central nervous system tumors: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2024Article
- Comprehensive fertility preservation can be offered in a timely manner around gonadotoxic therapy in children and adolescents.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Treatment for childhood solid tumors may lead to an increased risk for gonadal dysfunction/infertility. Discussion of risk should occur at diagnosis, any changes in therapy, and during survivorship. Gonadotoxic therapies were abstracted from 32 Children's Oncology Group (COG) phase III, frontline solid tumor protocols, in use from 2000 to 2022. Risk for gonadal dysfunction/infertility was assessed based on gonadotoxic therapies, sex, and pubertal status and assigned as minimal, significant, and high following the Oncofertility Consortium Pediatric Initiative Network (PIN) risk stratification. Most protocols (65.6%, 21/32) contained at least one therapeutic arm with a high level of increased risk. Solid tumor therapies present challenges in risk stratification due to response-adjusted therapy and the need to account for radiation field in the risk assessment. This guide hopes to serve as a tool to assist in standardizing gonadotoxic risk assessments across disciplines and improve referral for fertility services and reproductive health counseling for patients receiving COG-based solid tumor therapy. Internationally, many solid tumor therapies follow similar paradigms to COG studies, and risk stratifications may be generalizable to similar styles of therapy. In addition, this model may be applied to other international groups with the goal of standardizing fertility assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.