ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2024
Development of a screening system of gene sets for estimating the time of early skeletal muscle injury based on second-generation sequencing technology.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Greedy regression-based cross-species gene expression modeling: a translational framework for forensic wound age estimation.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The present study is aimed to address the challenge of wound age estimation in forensic science by identifying reliable genetic markers using low-cost and high-precision second-generation sequencing technology. A total of 54 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to a control group or injury groups, with injury groups being further divided into time points (4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 16 h, 20 h, 24 h, 28 h, and 32 h after injury, n = 6) to establish rat skeletal muscle contusion models. Gene expression data were obtained using second-generation sequencing technology, and differential gene expression analysis, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and time-dependent expression trend analysis were performed. A total of six sets of biomarkers were obtained: differentially expressed genes at adjacent time points (127 genes), co-expressed genes most associated with wound age (213 genes), hub genes exhibiting time-dependent expression (264 genes), and sets of transcription factors (TF) corresponding to the above sets of genes (74, 87, and 99 genes, respectively). Then, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and multilayer perceptron (MLP), were constructed for wound age estimation from the above gene sets. The results estimated by transcription factors were all superior to the corresponding hub genes, with the transcription factor group of WGCNA performed the best, with average accuracy rates of 96% for three models' internal testing, and 91.7% for the highest external validation. This study demonstrates the advantages of the indicator screening system based on second-generation sequencing technology and transcription factor level for wound age estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.