Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38532177›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2024

Corticospinal and spinal responses following a single session of lower limb motor skill and resistance training.

Alex Woodhead, Christopher Rainer, Jessica Hill, Colm P Murphy, Jamie S North, Dawson Kidgell, Jamie Tallent

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alex WoodheadFaculty of Sport, Technology and Health Sciences, St. Mary's University, Twickenham, Middlesex, TW1 4SX, UK. alex.woodhead@stmarys.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6163-833X
Christopher RainerFaculty of Sport, Technology and Health Sciences, St. Mary's University, Twickenham, Middlesex, TW1 4SX, UK.
Jessica HillFaculty of Sport, Technology and Health Sciences, St. Mary's University, Twickenham, Middlesex, TW1 4SX, UK.
Colm P MurphyCardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.
Jamie S NorthFaculty of Sport, Technology and Health Sciences, St. Mary's University, Twickenham, Middlesex, TW1 4SX, UK.
Dawson KidgellMonash Exercise Neuroplasticity Research Unit, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3199, Australia.
Jamie TallentSchool of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior studies suggest resistance exercise as a potential form of motor learning due to task-specific corticospinal responses observed in single sessions of motor skill and resistance training. While existing literature primarily focuses on upper limb muscles, revealing a task-dependent nature in eliciting corticospinal responses, our aim was to investigate such responses after a single session of lower limb motor skill and resistance training. Twelve participants engaged in a visuomotor force tracking task, self-paced knee extensions, and a control task. Corticospinal, spinal, and neuromuscular responses were measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS). Assessments occurred at baseline, immediately post, and at 30-min intervals over two hours. Force steadiness significantly improved in the visuomotor task (P < 0.001). Significant fixed-effects emerged between conditions for corticospinal excitability, corticospinal inhibition, and spinal excitability (all P < 0.001). Lower limb motor skill training resulted in a greater corticospinal excitability compared to resistance training (mean difference [MD] = 35%, P < 0.001) and control (MD; 37%, P < 0.001). Motor skill training resulted in a lower corticospinal inhibition compared to control (MD; - 10%, P < 0.001) and resistance training (MD; - 9%, P < 0.001). Spinal excitability was lower following motor skill training compared to control (MD; - 28%, P < 0.001). No significant fixed effect of Time or Time*Condition interactions were observed. Our findings highlight task-dependent corticospinal responses in lower limb motor skill training, offering insights for neurorehabilitation program design.

Indexed as

Lower ExtremityMotor SkillsPyramidal TractsResistance TrainingAdultEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalSpinal CordTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultCorticospinal excitabilityLower limbMotor skill trainingResistance trainingTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.