Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38532176›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2024

Benchmarking ANI potentials as a rescoring function and screening FDA drugs for SARS-CoV-2 M

Irem N Zengin, M Serdar Koca, Omer Tayfuroglu, Muslum Yildiz, Abdulkadir Kocak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Irem N ZenginDepartment of Chemistry, Gebze Technical University, 41400, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey.
M Serdar KocaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Gebze Technical University, 41400, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Omer TayfurogluDepartment of Chemistry, Gebze Technical University, 41400, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Muslum YildizDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Gebze Technical University, 41400, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Abdulkadir KocakDepartment of Chemistry, Gebze Technical University, 41400, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey. kocak@gtu.edu.tr.

Funding

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu 120Z732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we introduce the use of ANI-ML potentials as a rescoring function in the host-guest interaction in molecular docking. Our results show that the "docking power" of ANI potentials can compete with the current scoring functions at the same level of computational cost. Benchmarking studies on CASF-2016 dataset showed that ANI is ranked in the top 5 scoring functions among the other 34 tested. In particular, the ANI predicted interaction energies when used in conjunction with GOLD-PLP scoring function can boost the top ranked solution to be the closest to the x-ray structure. Rapid and accurate calculation of interaction energies between ligand and protein also enables screening of millions of drug candidates/docking poses. Using a unique protocol in which docking by GOLD-PLP, rescoring by ANI-ML potentials and extensive MD simulations along with end state free energy methods are combined, we have screened FDA approved drugs against the SARS-CoV-2 main protease (M

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2BenchmarkingHumansMolecular Docking SimulationProtease InhibitorsProtein BindingProtease InhibitorsBinding modeInteraction energyMolecular dockingRescoringScoring function

Identifiers

PMID38532176
PMCPMC10965596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.