Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38532080›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024

A remote digital memory composite to detect cognitive impairment in memory clinic samples in unsupervised settings using mobile devices.

David Berron, Wenzel Glanz, Lindsay Clark, Kristin Basche, Xenia Grande, Jeremie Güsten, Ornella V Billette, Ina Hempen, Muhammad Hashim Naveed, Nadine Diersch and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Digital cognitive phenotyping enhances risk stratification in preclinical Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

David BerronGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Magdeburg, Germany. david.berron@dzne.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1558-1883
Wenzel GlanzGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Magdeburg, Germany.
Lindsay ClarkDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, US.
Kristin BascheDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, US.
Xenia GrandeGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2486-3201
Jeremie GüstenGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Magdeburg, Germany.
Ornella V Billetteneotiv GmbH, Magdeburg, Germany.
Ina Hempenneotiv GmbH, Magdeburg, Germany.
Muhammad Hashim Naveedneotiv GmbH, Magdeburg, Germany.
Nadine Dierschneotiv GmbH, Magdeburg, Germany.
Michaela ButrynGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Magdeburg, Germany.
Annika SpottkeGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany.
Katharina BuergerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Munich, Germany.
Robert PerneczkyGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Munich, Germany.
Anja SchneiderGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany.
Stefan TeipelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Jens WiltfangGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Göttingen, Germany.
Sterling JohnsonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, US.
Michael WagnerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2589-6440
Frank JessenGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Cologne, Germany.
Emrah DüzelGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Magdeburg, Germany. emrah.duezel@dzne.de.
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEAge UK · GBLund University · SE

Funding

Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention: Sex Differences in DNA MethylationR01AG027161 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Nathaniel Ark Chin, Sterling C Johnson · 2007 to 2026
$35.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG027161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remote monitoring of cognition holds the promise to facilitate case-finding in clinical care and the individual detection of cognitive impairment in clinical and research settings. In the context of Alzheimer's disease, this is particularly relevant for patients who seek medical advice due to memory problems. Here, we develop a remote digital memory composite (RDMC) score from an unsupervised remote cognitive assessment battery focused on episodic memory and long-term recall and assess its construct validity, retest reliability, and diagnostic accuracy when predicting MCI-grade impairment in a memory clinic sample and healthy controls. A total of 199 participants were recruited from three cohorts and included as healthy controls (n = 97), individuals with subjective cognitive decline (n = 59), or patients with mild cognitive impairment (n = 43). Participants performed cognitive assessments in a fully remote and unsupervised setting via a smartphone app. The derived RDMC score is significantly correlated with the PACC5 score across participants and demonstrates good retest reliability. Diagnostic accuracy for discriminating memory impairment from no impairment is high (cross-validated AUC = 0.83, 95% CI [0.66, 0.99]) with a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.72. Thus, unsupervised remote cognitive assessments implemented in the neotiv digital platform show good discrimination between cognitively impaired and unimpaired individuals, further demonstrating that it is feasible to complement the neuropsychological assessment of episodic memory with unsupervised and remote assessments on mobile devices. This contributes to recent efforts to implement remote assessment of episodic memory for case-finding and monitoring in large research studies and clinical care.

Identifiers

PMID38532080
PMCPMC10965892
OpenAlexW4393196609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.