Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38532067›Full record

ArticleDermatology and therapy2024

Virtual Learning Decreases the Carbon Footprint of Medical Education.

Divya Sharma, Julianne Rizzo, Yvonne Nong, Lilia C Murase, Sydney Fong, Kenny Lo, Misha Rosenbach, Raja Sivamani, Jenny E Murase

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Environmental Impact and Sustainability Associated with the Practice of Dermatology.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Divya Sharma *Department of Dermatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Julianne Rizzo *School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Yvonne NongIntegrative Skin Science and Research, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Lilia C MuraseSan Francisco Dermatologic Society, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Sydney FongIntegrative Skin Science and Research, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Kenny LoIntegrative Skin Science and Research, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Misha RosenbachDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Raja Sivamani *Integrative Skin Science and Research, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Jenny E Murase *Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. jemurase@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe environmental impact of holding in-person academic conferences and continuing medical education (CME) programs can be significant. In-person conferences provide a unique social and professional platform to engage in networking and foster professional development; however, there is an opportunity for hybrid and virtual platforms to provide CME for broader audiences looking to improve their clinical skills and strengthen their knowledge base. This study seeks to describe the reduction in carbon emissions associated with a webinar hosted by an online dermatology-focused medical education platform.

methodsThis cross-sectional study used the location of deidentified virtual attendees of a webinar to predict the carbon emissions produced if attendees had instead traveled to the location of the most recent Integrative Dermatology Symposium (Sacramento, CA). Following collection of each virtual attendee's location, the mode of transportation was predicted on the basis of each participant's distance to the conference.

resultsThe estimated carbon emissions were calculated for 576 participants. The total estimated, unadjusted carbon emissions for both attendees predicted to fly or drive was 370,100 kg CO

conclusionThe use of a virtual CME webinar led to a significant reduction in travel-related carbon dioxide emissions when compared to running the same program in-person event. When accounting for all passengers traveling via plane on any flight, driving to an event produced more emissions per participant than flying.

Indexed as

Carbon dioxide emissionsConferenceEmissionsGreenhouse gasIn-person conferencesTravelVirtual learning

Identifiers

PMID38532067
PMCPMC11052933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.