ArticleScientific reports2024
High-capacity data hiding for medical images based on the mask-RCNN model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based pressure injury staging: a multicentre study involving 59 hospitals.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Pixel shift-based reversible steganography for privacy-preserving medical images.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Image steganalysis using LSTM fused convolutional neural networks for secure telemedicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces a novel approach for integrating sensitive patient information within medical images with minimal impact on their diagnostic quality. Utilizing the mask region-based convolutional neural network for identifying regions of minimal medical significance, the method embeds information using discrete cosine transform-based steganography. The focus is on embedding within "insignificant areas", determined by deep learning models, to ensure image quality and confidentiality are maintained. The methodology comprises three main steps: neural network training for area identification, an embedding process for data concealment, and an extraction process for retrieving embedded information. Experimental evaluations on the CHAOS dataset demonstrate the method's effectiveness, with the model achieving an average intersection over union score of 0.9146, indicating accurate segmentation. Imperceptibility metrics, including peak signal-to-noise ratio, were employed to assess the quality of stego images, with results showing high capacity embedding with minimal distortion. Furthermore, the embedding capacity and payload analysis reveal the method's high capacity for data concealment. The proposed method outperforms existing techniques by offering superior image quality, as evidenced by higher peak signal-to-noise ratio values, and efficient concealment capacity, making it a promising solution for secure medical image handling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.