Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38531860›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Predicting and improving complex beer flavor through machine learning.

Michiel Schreurs, Supinya Piampongsant, Miguel Roncoroni, Lloyd Cool, Beatriz Herrera-Malaver, Christophe Vanderaa, Florian A Theßeling, Łukasz Kreft, Alexander Botzki, Philippe Malcorps and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Machine-learning-assisted screening of key flavor compounds in pumpkins.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Predicting food taste with bound-driven optimization.Current research in food science · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Michiel Schreurs *VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Gaston Geenslaan 1, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9449-5619
Supinya Piampongsant *VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Gaston Geenslaan 1, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Miguel Roncoroni *VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Gaston Geenslaan 1, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7461-1427
Lloyd CoolVIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Gaston Geenslaan 1, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9936-3124
Beatriz Herrera-MalaverVIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Gaston Geenslaan 1, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5096-9974
Christophe VanderaaLaboratory of Socioecology and Social Evolution, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 59, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7443-5427
Florian A TheßelingVIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Gaston Geenslaan 1, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Łukasz KreftVIB Bioinformatics Core, VIB, Rijvisschestraat 120, B-9052, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7620-4657
Alexander BotzkiVIB Bioinformatics Core, VIB, Rijvisschestraat 120, B-9052, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6691-4233
Philippe MalcorpsAB InBev SA/NV, Brouwerijplein 1, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Luk DaenenAB InBev SA/NV, Brouwerijplein 1, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Tom WenseleersLaboratory of Socioecology and Social Evolution, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 59, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1434-861X
Kevin J VerstrepenVIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Gaston Geenslaan 1, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium. kevin.verstrepen@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0002-3077-6219

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Research Foundation Flanders) G.0A51.15KU Leuven (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven) C16/17/006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perception and appreciation of food flavor depends on many interacting chemical compounds and external factors, and therefore proves challenging to understand and predict. Here, we combine extensive chemical and sensory analyses of 250 different beers to train machine learning models that allow predicting flavor and consumer appreciation. For each beer, we measure over 200 chemical properties, perform quantitative descriptive sensory analysis with a trained tasting panel and map data from over 180,000 consumer reviews to train 10 different machine learning models. The best-performing algorithm, Gradient Boosting, yields models that significantly outperform predictions based on conventional statistics and accurately predict complex food features and consumer appreciation from chemical profiles. Model dissection allows identifying specific and unexpected compounds as drivers of beer flavor and appreciation. Adding these compounds results in variants of commercial alcoholic and non-alcoholic beers with improved consumer appreciation. Together, our study reveals how big data and machine learning uncover complex links between food chemistry, flavor and consumer perception, and lays the foundation to develop novel, tailored foods with superior flavors.

Indexed as

BeerTaste PerceptionConsumer BehaviorMachine LearningTaste

Identifiers

PMID38531860
PMCPMC10966102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.