Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38531675›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Development and internal validation of a dynamic fall risk prediction and monitoring tool in aged care using routinely collected electronic health data: a landmarking approach.

Nasir Wabe, Isabelle Meulenbroeks, Guogui Huang, Sandun Malpriya Silva, Leonard C Gray, Jacqueline C T Close, Stephen Lord, Johanna I Westbrook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. AI-Based Automation for Medication Reconciliation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Moving forward on the science of informatics and predictive analytics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nasir WabeCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.
Isabelle MeulenbroeksCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.
Guogui HuangCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.
Sandun Malpriya SilvaCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.
Leonard C GrayCentre for Health Service Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Jacqueline C T CloseNeuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Stephen LordNeuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Johanna I WestbrookCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1083-8192

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFalls pose a significant challenge in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Existing falls prediction tools perform poorly and fail to capture evolving risk factors. We aimed to develop and internally validate dynamic fall risk prediction models and create point-based scoring systems for residents with and without dementia. MATERIALS AND

methodsA longitudinal cohort study using electronic data from 27 RACFs in Sydney, Australia. The study included 5492 permanent residents, with a 70%-30% split for training and validation. The outcome measure was the incidence of falls. We tracked residents for 60 months, using monthly landmarks with 1-month prediction windows. We employed landmarking dynamic prediction for model development, a time-dependent area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROCC) for model evaluations, and a regression coefficient approach to create point-based scoring systems.

resultsThe model identified 15 independent predictors of falls in dementia and 12 in nondementia cohorts. Falls history was the key predictor of subsequent falls in both dementia (HR 4.75, 95% CI, 4.45-5.06) and nondementia cohorts (HR 4.20, 95% CI, 3.87-4.57). The AUROCC across landmarks ranged from 0.67 to 0.87 for dementia and from 0.66 to 0.86 for nondementia cohorts but generally remained between 0.75 and 0.85 in both cohorts. The total point risk score ranged from -2 to 57 for dementia and 0 to 52 for nondementia cohorts. DISCUSSION: Our novel risk prediction models and scoring systems provide timely person-centered information for continuous monitoring of fall risk in RACFs.

conclusionEmbedding these tools within electronic health records could facilitate the implementation of targeted proactive interventions to prevent falls.

Indexed as

DementiaHomes for the AgedAgedElectronicsHumansLongitudinal StudiesRisk Factorsfall risk predictionfallsnursing homesresidential aged care

Identifiers

PMID38531675
PMCPMC11031240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.