Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38531654›Full record

ReviewRNA (New York, N.Y.)2024

ac4C: a fragile modification with stabilizing functions in RNA metabolism.

Sarah Schiffers, Shalini Oberdoerffer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. NNature · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The NAT10/acCell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah SchiffersLaboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Shalini OberdoerfferLaboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA shalini.oberdoerffer@nih.gov.
National Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Impact of chromatin structure on alternative splicing of CD45 pre-mRNAZIABC011293 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI OBERDOERFFER, SHALINI · 2010 to 2025
$22.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, concerted efforts to map and understand epitranscriptomic modifications in mRNA have unveiled new complexities in the regulation of gene expression. These studies cumulatively point to diverse functions in mRNA metabolism, spanning pre-mRNA processing, mRNA degradation, and translation. However, this emerging landscape is not without its intricacies and sources of discrepancies. Disparities in detection methodologies, divergent interpretations of functional outcomes, and the complex nature of biological systems across different cell types pose significant challenges. With a focus of N4-acetylcytidine (ac4C), this review endeavors to unravel conflicting narratives by examining the technological, biological, and methodological factors that have contributed to discrepancies and thwarted research progress. Our goal is to mitigate detection inconsistencies and establish a unified model to elucidate the contribution of ac4C to mRNA metabolism and cellular equilibrium.

Indexed as

CytidineRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalRNARNA, MessengerCytidineN-acetylcytidineRNARNA, Messengerac4CepitranscriptomeN4-acetylcytidineNAT10

Identifiers

PMID38531654
PMCPMC11019744
OpenAlexW4393390527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.