Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38531562›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Clinical practice guideline recommendations to improve the mental health of adult trauma patients: protocol for a systematic review.

Mélanie Bérubé, Nori Bradley, Meaghan O'Donnell, Henry Thomas Stelfox, Naisan Garraway, Helen-Maria Vasiliadis, Valerie Turcotte, Michel Perreault, Matthew Menear, Léonie Archambault and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Mélanie BérubéPopulation Health and Optimal Practices Research Unit Research Unit (Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, Quebec, Canada melanie.berube@fsi.ulaval.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6657-3915
Nori BradleyUniversity of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Meaghan O'DonnellDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Henry Thomas StelfoxDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Naisan GarrawayVancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Helen-Maria VasiliadisUniversity of Sherbrooke, Longueil, Quebec, Canada.
Valerie TurcotteDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada.
Michel PerreaultInstitut universitaire en santé mentale Douglas, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Matthew MenearDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada.
Léonie ArchambaultInstitut universitaire en santé mentale Douglas, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Juanita HaagsmaFaculty of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hélène ProvencherFaculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada.
Christine GenestFaculté des sciences infirmières, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Marc-Aurèle GagnonPopulation Health and Optimal Practices Research Unit Research Unit (Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, Quebec, Canada.
Laurence BourquePopulation Health and Optimal Practices Research Unit Research Unit (Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, Quebec, Canada.
Alexandra LapierrePopulation Health and Optimal Practices Research Unit Research Unit (Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8704-4940
Amal KhalfiFaculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada.
William PanenkaDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
The Quebec Population Health Research Network · CAUniversité Laval · CADouglas Mental Health University Institute · CAAlberta Hospital Edmonton · CAErasmus MC · NLInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec · CAThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAVancouver General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMental disorders are common in adult patients with traumatic injuries. To limit the burden of poor psychological well-being in this population, recognised authorities have issued recommendations through clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). However, the uptake of evidence-based recommendations to improve the mental health of trauma patients has been low until recently. This may be explained by the complexity of optimising mental health practices and interpretating CGPs scope and quality. Our aim is to systematically review CPG mental health recommendations in the context of trauma care and appraise their quality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will identify CPG through a search strategy applied to Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases, as well as guidelines repositories and websites of trauma associations. We will target CPGs on adult and acute trauma populations including at least one recommendation on any prevention, screening, assessment, intervention, patient and family engagement, referral or follow-up procedure related to mental health endorsed by recognised organisations in high-income countries. No language limitations will be applied, and we will limit the search to the last 15 years. Pairs of reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts, full texts, and carry out data extraction and quality assessment of CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II. We will synthesise the evidence on recommendations for CPGs rated as moderate or high quality using a matrix based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation quality of evidence, strength of recommendation, health and social determinants and whether recommendations were made using a population-based approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required, as we will conduct secondary analysis of published data. The results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal, at international and national scientific meetings. Accessible summary will be distributed to interested parties through professional, healthcare quality and persons with lived experience associations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: (ID454728).

Indexed as

Mental HealthQuality of Health CareAdultDatabases, FactualHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicMENTAL HEALTHProtocols & guidelinesSystematic ReviewTRAUMA MANAGEMENT

Identifiers

PMID38531562
PMCPMC10966799
OpenAlexW4393203230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.