Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38531396›Full record

ArticleArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2024

Practices in the prescription of antiseizure medications: is it time to change?

Lécio Figueira Pinto, Lucas Scárdua Silva, Rafael Batista João, Vinícius Boldrini, Fernando Cendes, Clarissa Lin Yasuda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Factors Limiting Access to Surgical Treatment of Focal Epilepsy in Kazakh Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lécio Figueira PintoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Instituto Central, Divisão de Clínica Neurológica, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2694-5120
Lucas Scárdua SilvaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN), Campinas SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0645-8456
Rafael Batista JoãoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN), Campinas SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4518-2090
Vinícius BoldriniUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN), Campinas SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3984-2689
Fernando CendesUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN), Campinas SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9336-9568
Clarissa Lin YasudaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN), Campinas SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9084-7173
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of epilepsy has advanced over the past 30 years through the development of new antiseizure medications (ASMs). Unfortunately, not all of them have been approved yet in Brazil, and many are still underused. When comparing new ASMs to older ones, they are generally not more effective in treating epilepsy. However, they offer better tolerability, with fewer interactions and long-term side effects, especially for patients with comorbidities or those requiring polytherapy. Enzyme induction caused by older ASMs is associated with increased cholesterol levels, drug interactions with decreased effects of statins and other cardiovascular medications, anticoagulants, chemotherapy, immunosuppressors, anti-infective agents (including HIV treatment), antidepressants, and contraceptives. Additionally, they can reduce levels of vitamin D and sex hormones, as well as decrease bone density. The increasing concern about these effects during life, especially after prolonged exposure, has led most developed countries to change prescription patterns in favor of new ASMs, particularly levetiracetam and lamotrigine. Both are also considered the safest options for women of childbearing age. Regrettably, the prescription trends in Brazil have remained largely unchanged over time. This can be partially attributed to the slower approval process of ASM and the reluctance of general physicians and neurologists to embrace these new concepts. In this concise review, we highlight the various advantages linked to the new ASM, aiming to promote a shift in the prescription pattern for ASM. The selection of ASM should be customized according to individual characteristics, and practical suggestions for choosing ASMs are provided in this paper.

Indexed as

EpilepsyVitaminsAnticoagulantsAnticonvulsantsBone DensityBrazilFemaleHumansAnticoagulantsAnticonvulsantsVitamins

Identifiers

PMID38531396
PMCPMC10965294
OpenAlexW4394740324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.