Trial reportInternational wound journal2024
Antibiotic bone cement accelerates diabetic foot wound healing: Elucidating the role of ROCK1 protein expression.
Trial report in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in the treatment of diabetic foot: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Antibiotic bone cement accelerates diabetic foot wound healing: Elucidating the role of ROCK1 protein expression.International wound journal · 2024Trial
- Engineering macrophage phenotype switching via nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor protein 3 inflammasome inhibition: A translational approach using antibiotic cement for diabetic foot ulcers.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of the therapeutic effect of antibiotic bone cement on Wagner grade 3 or 4 diabetic foot ulcer in heel and non-heel areas: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical studies indicate antibiotic bone cement with propeller flaps improves diabetic foot wound repair and reduces amputation rates, but the molecular mechanisms, particularly key proteins' role remain largely unexplored. This study assessed the efficacy of antibiotic bone cement for treating diabetic foot wounds, focusing on molecular impact on ROCK1. Sixty patients were randomized into experimental (EXP, n = 40) and control (CON, n = 20) groups, treated with antibiotic bone cement and negative pressure. Wound healing rate, amputation rate, wound secretion culture and C-reactive protein (CRP) changes, were monitored. Comprehensive molecular investigations were conducted and animal experiments were performed to further validate the findings. Statistical methods were employed to verify significant differences between the groups and treatment outcomes. The EXP group showed significant improvements in wound healing (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.