ArticleUltrasonics2024
Grating lobe mitigation on large-pitch arrays using null subtraction imaging.
Article in Ultrasonics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large elements and advanced beamformers for increased field of view in 2-D ultrasound matrix arrays.ArXiv · 2026Article
- Increasing ultrasound field-of-view with reduced element count arrays containing large elements.ArXiv · 2026Article
- Null subtraction imaging combined with modified delay multiply-and-sum beamforming for coherent plane-wave compounding.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Null Subtraction Imaging (NSI) is a novel beamforming technique that can produce B-mode images resulting in high spatial resolution and low computational cost compared to other beamforming techniques. Previous work has demonstrated that in addition to a beam pattern with a narrow main lobe and low side lobes, NSI can also reduce or mitigate grating lobes, which can appear when the array pitch is larger than one half the wavelength of the transmitted pulse. These grating lobes can result in imaging artifacts that produce clutter and lower contrast. By lowering grating lobe levels, a larger pitch array could be used, which could allow arrays with a larger field of view while maintaining a standard element count. This could have important benefits for specific applications such as ultrasonic abdominal imaging. Experiments were conducted to examine the feasibility of using NSI with large pitch, wide field-of-view arrays. Grating lobe reduction was measured against array pitch, DC offset, and f-number. Experiments were conducted on wire targets and contrast targets in a phantom and results were further verified in vivo by imaging the liver of a rabbit. The results demonstrated that NSI was able to reduce grating lobe brightness by up to 45 dB compared to delay-and-sum (DAS) beamforming when using planewave transmissions, reduce the generalized contrast-to-noise ratio (gCNR) of grating lobe regions from 0.60 to 0.08, and maintain a similar speckle quality to DAS. The gCNR of anechoic regions also improves, increasing from 0.09 to 0.15 on an array with a pitch of 5 wavelengths. Due to significant grating lobe level reduction, NSI shows potential to improve image quality over DAS on a large pitch, wide field-of-view array.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.