Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38531069›Full record

ArticleGenetics2024

Mouse Genome Informatics: an integrated knowledgebase system for the laboratory mouse.

Richard M Baldarelli, Cynthia L Smith, Martin Ringwald, Joel E Richardson, Carol J Bult, Mouse Genome Informatics Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Codon-optimizedMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Evidence-based classification of genes implicated in skeletal disorders using the ClinGen curation framework.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Richard M BaldarelliThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5819-0228
Cynthia L SmithThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, USA.
Martin RingwaldThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, USA.
Joel E RichardsonThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, USA.
Carol J BultThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9433-210X
Mouse Genome Informatics Group

Funding

SOFTWARE AND DATABASE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENTP41HG000330 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI EPPIG, JANAN T. · 1995 to 2010
$72.1M
Text mining in the CloudU24HG010859 · NHGRI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CAROL J BULT, PAUL Warren STERNBERG · 2019 to 2026
$42.0M
Technical DevelopmentP41HD062499 · NICHD · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI MARTIN RINGWALD · 2011 to 2026
$37.3M
Mouse Genome Database (MGD): A Core Knowledge Resource for Functional Characterization of the Human GenomeU24HG000330 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI CAROL J BULT, Cynthia Louise Smith · 2021 to 2026
$20.5M
Gene Ontology Consortium and KnowledgebaseU24HG012212 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHRISTOPHER J MUNGALL, PAUL Warren STERNBERG · 2022 to 2026
$11.6M
CRE Driver Strain ResourcesR24OD011190 · OD · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI MURRAY, STEPHEN A, SMITH, CYNTHIA LOUISE · 2012 to 2022
$7.9M
Learning in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's DiseaseF31MH067445 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI KACZOROWSKI, CATHERINE COOK · 2002 to 2005
$137k
NHGRI NIH HHS HD062499NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG000330NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG000330NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG010859NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG012212NICHD NIH HHS P41 HD062499NIH HHS R24 OD011190NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH067445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) is a federation of expertly curated information resources designed to support experimental and computational investigations into genetic and genomic aspects of human biology and disease using the laboratory mouse as a model system. The Mouse Genome Database (MGD) and the Gene Expression Database (GXD) are core MGI databases that share data and system architecture. MGI serves as the central community resource of integrated information about mouse genome features, variation, expression, gene function, phenotype, and human disease models acquired from peer-reviewed publications, author submissions, and major bioinformatics resources. To facilitate integration and standardization of data, biocuration scientists annotate using terms from controlled metadata vocabularies and biological ontologies (e.g. Mammalian Phenotype Ontology, Mouse Developmental Anatomy, Disease Ontology, Gene Ontology, etc.), and by applying international community standards for gene, allele, and mouse strain nomenclature. MGI serves basic scientists, translational researchers, and data scientists by providing access to FAIR-compliant data in both human-readable and compute-ready formats. The MGI resource is accessible at https://informatics.jax.org. Here, we present an overview of the core data types represented in MGI and highlight recent enhancements to the resource with a focus on new data and functionality for MGD and GXD.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenomeAnimalsComputational BiologyGenomicsHumansKnowledge BasesMicegene expressiongeneticsgenome informaticsmodel organismmouse modelsphenotypes

Identifiers

PMID38531069
PMCPMC11075557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.