Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38530823›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a collaborative deprescribing intervention of proton-pump-inhibitors on community-dwelling older adults: Protocol for the C-SENIoR, a pragmatic non-randomized controlled trial.

Sónia Romano, Luis Monteiro, José Pedro Guerreiro, João Braga Simões, António Teixeira Rodrigues, Nuno Lunet, Julian Perelman

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sónia RomanoCentre for Health Evaluation & Research/Infosaúde, National Association of Pharmacies (CEFAR-IF/ANF), Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2055-0996
Luis MonteiroCentre for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto (CINTESIS), Porto, Portugal.
José Pedro GuerreiroCentre for Health Evaluation & Research/Infosaúde, National Association of Pharmacies (CEFAR-IF/ANF), Lisboa, Portugal.
João Braga SimõesLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
António Teixeira RodriguesCentre for Health Evaluation & Research/Infosaúde, National Association of Pharmacies (CEFAR-IF/ANF), Lisboa, Portugal.
Nuno LunetDepartamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1870-1430
Julian PerelmanNOVA National School of Public Health, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversity of Minho · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWorldwide, demographic ageing is a major social, economic and health challenge. Despite the increase in life expectancy, elderly often live with multiple chronic conditions, exposing them to multiple medications. Concerns have been raised about the growing issue of inappropriate long-term usage of proton-pump inhibitors (PPI), which have been associated with adverse outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Deprescribing is a recommended intervention to reduce or withdraw medicines that might be causing harm or might no longer be of benefit. This protocol details a trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a collaborative deprescribing intervention of PPI among community-dwelling elderly, involving community pharmacists and general practitioners. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A pragmatic, multicentre, two-arm, non-randomised controlled trial of a structured PPI collaborative deprescribing intervention in the primary care setting with a 6-month follow-up will be conducted. Patients must be 65 years old or older, live in the community and have been using PPI for more than 8 weeks. We hypothesize that the intervention will reduce the PPI usage in the intervention group compared to the control group. The primary outcome is the successful discontinuation or dose decrease of any PPI, defined as a statistically significant absolute 20% reduction in medication use between the intervention and control groups at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. An economic evaluation will be conducted alongside the trial. This study was approved by the Ethics Research Committee of Nova Medical School, NOVA University of Lisbon and by the Ethics Committee from the Local Health Unit Alto Minho, Portugal. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a patient-centred collaborative deprescribing intervention in the community setting in Portugal. It will also inform improvements for the development of future multi-faceted interventions that aim to optimise medication for the community-dwelling elderly. CLINICAL

trial registrationISRCTN 49637686.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsProton Pump InhibitorsAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansIndependent LivingNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicProtonsProton Pump InhibitorsProtons

Identifiers

PMID38530823
PMCPMC10965080
OpenAlexW4393201767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.