ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
NIEND: neuronal image enhancement through noise disentanglement.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A framework for comparative analysis of human and mouse cortical neuron dendrites in corresponding brain regions.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- A mouse brain atlas based on dendritic microenvironments.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- NeuroXiv: AI-powered open databasing and dynamic mining of brain-wide neuron morphometry.Nature methods · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe full automation of digital neuronal reconstruction from light microscopic images has long been impeded by noisy neuronal images. Previous endeavors to improve image quality can hardly get a good compromise between robustness and computational efficiency.
resultsWe present the image enhancement pipeline named Neuronal Image Enhancement through Noise Disentanglement (NIEND). Through extensive benchmarking on 863 mouse neuronal images with manually annotated gold standards, NIEND achieves remarkable improvements in image quality such as signal-background contrast (40-fold) and background uniformity (10-fold), compared to raw images. Furthermore, automatic reconstructions on NIEND-enhanced images have shown significant improvements compared to both raw images and images enhanced using other methods. Specifically, the average F1 score of NIEND-enhanced reconstructions is 0.88, surpassing the original 0.78 and the second-ranking method, which achieved 0.84. Up to 52% of reconstructions from NIEND-enhanced images outperform all other four methods in F1 scores. In addition, NIEND requires only 1.6 s on average for processing 256 × 256 × 256-sized images, and images after NIEND attain a substantial average compression rate of 1% by LZMA. NIEND improves image quality and neuron reconstruction, providing potential for significant advancements in automated neuron morphology reconstruction of petascale. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The study is conducted based on Vaa3D and Python 3.10. Vaa3D is available on GitHub (https://github.com/Vaa3D). The proposed NIEND method is implemented in Python, and hosted on GitHub along with the testing code and data (https://github.com/zzhmark/NIEND). The raw neuronal images of mouse brains can be found at the BICCN's Brain Image Library (BIL) (https://www.brainimagelibrary.org). The detailed list and associated meta information are summarized in Supplementary Table S3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.