Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38530612›Full record

ArticleSpine deformity2024

Predicting early return to the operating room in early-onset scoliosis patients using machine learning techniques.

Brett R Lullo, Patrick J Cahill, John M Flynn, Jason B Anari

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spine deformity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Deep learning based vertebra localization and Cobb angle estimation using x-ray images.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brett R LulloDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA. blullo@luriechildrens.org.ORCID 0009-0008-2015-1232
Patrick J CahillDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
John M FlynnDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jason B AnariDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is associated with high rates of complications, often requiring unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR). The aim of this study was to create and validate a machine learning model to predict which EOS patients will go on to require an UPROR during their treatment course.

methodsA retrospective review was performed of all surgical EOS patients with at least 2 years follow-up. Patients were stratified based on whether they had experienced an UPROR. Ten machine learning algorithms were trained using tenfold cross-validation on an independent training set of patients. Model performance was evaluated on a separate testing set via their area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Relative feature importance was calculated for the top-performing model.

results257 patients were included in the study. 146 patients experienced at least one UPROR (57%). Five factors were identified as significant and included in model training: age at initial surgery, EOS etiology, initial construct type, and weight and height at initial surgery. The Gaussian naïve Bayes model demonstrated the best performance on the testing set (AUC: 0.79). Significant protective factors against experiencing an UPROR were weight at initial surgery, idiopathic etiology, initial definitive fusion construct, and height at initial surgery.

conclusionsThe Gaussian naïve Bayes machine learning algorithm demonstrated the best performance for predicting UPROR in EOS patients. Heavier, taller, idiopathic patients with initial definitive fusion constructs experienced UPROR less frequently. This model can be used to better quantify risk, optimize patient factors, and choose surgical constructs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic: III.

Indexed as

Machine LearningScoliosisAge of OnsetChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleOperating RoomsPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesSpinal FusionDefinitive fusionEarly-onset scoliosisGrowing rodsMachine learningUnplanned reoperationVEPTR

Identifiers

PMID38530612
OpenAlexW4393194610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.