Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38530611›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2024

Evaluation of the prognostic performance of different cutoff values of lymph node ratio staging system for stage III colorectal cancer.

Yimin E, Chen Lu, Zijun Wang, Yicheng Huang, Pengcheng Ji, Xiagang Luo, Chaoshun Chu, Chunzhao Yu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yimin E *Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210011, China.
Chen Lu *Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Hospital Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Zijun Wang *Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210011, China.
Yicheng HuangDepartment of Anorectal Surgery, Suzhou Xiangcheng People's Hospital, Suzhou, China.
Pengcheng JiDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Hospital Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiagang LuoDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210011, China.
Chaoshun ChuDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210011, China. chuchaoshun@163.com.
Chunzhao YuDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210011, China. chunzhaoyu@njmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Primary Research and Development Plan of Jiangsu Province No.BE2019759Research project of Jiangsu Commission of Heath No.ZD2022063The fifth phase of the 333 Project scientific research project of Jiangsu Province No.BRA2020091The National Key Research and Development Program of China No.2018YFE0127300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study attempted to compare the prognostic performance of lymph node ratio (LNR) staging system with different cutoff values relative to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pN staging system in stage III colorectal cancer (CRC). Overall, 45,069 patients from the SEER dataset and 69 patients from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (the External set) who underwent surgical resection of the primary tumor and were diagnosed with stage III CRC by postoperative pathology were included. Patients were divided into three subgroups based on the LNR cutoff used in previous studies, Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted, and log-rank test was used to compare the differences among groups in terms of cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox regression model was applied for survival analysis. To evaluate the discriminatory power of different lymph node staging systems, Harrell's C statistic(C-index) and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) were applied. A set of optimal cutoff values (0.11; 0.36; 0.66) of LNR staging system with the most considerable discriminatory power to the prognosis in patients with stage III CRC (SEER set: C-index = 0.714; AIC = 58,942.46, External set: C-index = 0.809; AIC = 164.36) were obtained, and both were superior to the AJCC pN staging system (SEER set: C-index = 0.708; AIC = 59,071.20, External set: C-index = 0.788; AIC = 167.06). For evaluating the prognostic efficacy of patients with stage III colorectal cancer, the cutoff value (0.11; 0.36; 0.66) of LNR staging system had the best discrimination and prognostic ability, which was superior to LNR staging system under other cutoff values and AJCC pN staging system.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLymph Node RatioNeoplasm StagingAgedFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSEER ProgramColorectal cancerLymph node ratioLymph nodesPrognostic factor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.