Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38530566›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2024

An Automated Tool to Classify and Transform Unstructured MRI Data into BIDS Datasets.

Alexander Bartnik, Sujal Singh, Conan Sum, Mackenzie Smith, Niels Bergsland, Robert Zivadinov, Michael G Dwyer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander BartnikBuffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 77 Goodell St, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Sujal SinghBuffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 77 Goodell St, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Conan SumBuffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 77 Goodell St, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Mackenzie SmithBuffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 77 Goodell St, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Niels BergslandBuffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 77 Goodell St, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Robert ZivadinovBuffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 77 Goodell St, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Michael G DwyerBuffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 77 Goodell St, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA. mgdwyer@buffalo.edu.

Funding

University of Buffalo Clinical and Translational Science Institute - Supplement SchulyerUL1TR001412 · NCATS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MURPHY, TIMOTHY F · 2015 to 2024
$33.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR001412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing use of neuroimaging in clinical research has driven the creation of many large imaging datasets. However, these datasets often rely on inconsistent naming conventions in image file headers to describe acquisition, and time-consuming manual curation is necessary. Therefore, we sought to automate the process of classifying and organizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data according to acquisition types common to the clinical routine, as well as automate the transformation of raw, unstructured images into Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) datasets. To do this, we trained an XGBoost model to classify MRI acquisition types using relatively few acquisition parameters that are automatically stored by the MRI scanner in image file metadata, which are then mapped to the naming conventions prescribed by BIDS to transform the input images to the BIDS structure. The model recognizes MRI types with 99.475% accuracy, as well as a micro/macro-averaged precision of 0.9995/0.994, a micro/macro-averaged recall of 0.9995/0.989, and a micro/macro-averaged F1 of 0.9995/0.991. Our approach accurately and quickly classifies MRI types and transforms unstructured data into standardized structures with little-to-no user intervention, reducing the barrier of entry for clinical scientists and increasing the accessibility of existing neuroimaging data.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingBrainDatabases, FactualDatasets as TopicHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAutomationBIDSData CurationMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.