Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38530556›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2024

Multidisciplinary approach for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): 2023 expert consensus of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group GECP.

Aylen Vanessa Ospina, Sergio Bolufer Nadal, José Luis Campo-Cañaveral de la Cruz, Jose Luis González Larriba, Ivan Macía Vidueira, Bartomeu Massutí Sureda, Ernest Nadal, Florentino Hernando Trancho, Antonio Álvarez Kindelán, Edel Del Barco Morillo and 19 more

Abstract readConsensus StatementReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Aylen Vanessa OspinaHead of the Oncology Department at the Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro. Full Professor of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/Manuel de Falla, 1 Majadahonda, 28222, Madrid, Spain. avospina@hotmail.com.
Sergio Bolufer NadalH. General Universitario Dr. Balmis de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
José Luis Campo-Cañaveral de la CruzHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Jose Luis González LarribaH. Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Ivan Macía VidueiraH. Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Bartomeu Massutí SuredaH. Universitario Dr Balmis Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Ernest NadalICO Bellvitge, Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain.
Florentino Hernando TranchoH. Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Antonio Álvarez KindelánH. Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.
Edel Del Barco MorilloH. Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Reyes Bernabé CaroHospital Virgen Del Rocio, Seville, Spain.
Joaquim Bosch BarreraICO, H. Universitario Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.
Virginia Calvo de JuanHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Joaquin Casal RubioH. Universitario Alvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, Spain.
Javier de CastroH. Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Ángel Cilleruelo RamosH. Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Manuel Cobo DolsH. Regional Universitario Málaga, Malaga, Spain.
Manuel Dómine GómezH. Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
Santiago Figueroa AlmánzarH. Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Rosario Garcia CampeloH. Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Amelia Insa MolláH. Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
José Ramón Jarabo SarcedaH. Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Unai Jiménez MaestreH. Universitario Cruces, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Rafael López CastroH. Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Margarita MajemH. de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Alex Martinez-MartiH. Universitari Vall D'hebrón, Barcelona, Spain.
Elisabeth Martínez TéllezH. de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
David Sánchez LorenteH. Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Mariano ProvencioHead of the Oncology Department at the Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro. Full Professor of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/Manuel de Falla, 1 Majadahonda, 28222, Madrid, Spain. mariano.provencio@uam.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9053-9197

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecent advances in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC have led to changes in the standard of care for this disease. For the selection of the best approach strategy for each patient, it is necessary the homogenization of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, as well as the promotion of the evaluation of patients by a multidisciplinary oncology team.

objectiveDevelopment of an expert consensus document with suggestions for the approach and treatment of locally advanced NSCLC leaded by Spanish Lung Cancer Group GECP.

methodsBetween March and July 2023, a panel of 28 experts was formed. Using a mixed technique (Delphi/nominal group) under the guidance of a coordinating group, consensus was reached in 4 phases: 1. Literature review and definition of discussion topics 2. First round of voting 3. Communicating the results and second round of voting 4. Definition of conclusions in nominal group meeting. Responses were consolidated using medians and interquartile ranges. The threshold for agreement was defined as 85% of the votes.

resultsNew and controversial situations regarding the diagnosis and management of locally advanced NSCLC were analyzed and reconciled based on evidence and clinical experience. Discussion issues included: molecular diagnosis and biomarkers, radiologic and surgical diagnosis, mediastinal staging, role of the multidisciplinary thoracic committee, neoadjuvant treatment indications, evaluation of response to neoadjuvant treatment, postoperative evaluation, and follow-up.

conclusionsConsensus clinical suggestions were generated on the most relevant scenarios such as diagnosis, staging and treatment of locally advanced lung cancer, which will serve to support decision-making in daily practice.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungConsensusLung NeoplasmsDelphi TechniqueHumansNeoplasm StagingPatient Care TeamSpainExpert consensusImmunotherapyLocally advanced NSCLCNeoadjuvantSurgery

Identifiers

PMID38530556
PMCPMC11178633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.