ArticleObesity surgery2024
Nutrition to Enhance Metabolic-Bariatric Surgery Outcomes.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy of Body Composition Prediction Equations in Middle-Aged Females with Class II and III Obesity.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor Regarding "Sex-Specific Changes in Body Composition Following Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Are Associated with the Remission of Metabolic Syndrome".Obesity surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGender-specific post-surgical goals for 12-month percent body fat (%BF) based on World Health Organization (WHO) obesity thresholds and for lean mass-sparing were published as preliminary body composition (BC) guidelines to address a knowledge gap in metabolic-bariatric surgery (MBS). Other studies' %BF outcomes inconsistently fell below obesity thresholds; none described nutrition practices. To help practitioners positively influence patients' BC and weight changes, this study describes the team-supported process of conducting serial body composition analysis (sBCA) concomitantly with the evidence-based nutrition practices applied to generate the preliminary guidelines.
methodsGuidelines were generated using the cumulative outcomes of separate, original research board-approved Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy studies. One dietitian assessed BC using the same bioimpedance machine, educated patients, and collected data from patients aged 18 and older in a 532-bed nonprofit acute-care institution in Northeast Ohio, USA, from May, 2007, through November, 2016. Essential to pre- and postoperative education was the "Nutrition Goal Checklist," an evidence-based synopsis of imperative practices. Body composition was assessed on initial visit, presurgically, and postoperative months 3, 6, and 12, generating individual patient handouts of progressive weight and BC changes with coordinating %BF graphs. Serial assessment enabled intervention toward meeting BC goals.
resultsFor genders in both surgeries, the described process influenced highly significant fat mass reduction, transitioning %BF below obesity thresholds. Lean mass-sparing outcomes supported the suggested preliminary guidelines.
conclusionsUtilizing sBCA with evidence-based nutrition practices consistently generated outcomes to formulate preliminary BC guidelines following MBS. Further research is needed to solidify formal guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38530551What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.