Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38530536›Full record

ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2024

The Synergetic Effect of 3D Printing and Electrospinning Techniques in the Fabrication of Bone Scaffolds.

Yongjie Qi, Hangying Lv, Qinghua Huang, Guangyong Pan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yongjie QiSchool of Intelligent Manufacturing, Zhejiang Guangsha Vocational and Technical University of Construction, Dongyang, 322100, China.
Hangying LvSchool of Intelligent Manufacturing, Zhejiang Guangsha Vocational and Technical University of Construction, Dongyang, 322100, China.
Qinghua HuangSchool of Intelligent Manufacturing, Zhejiang Guangsha Vocational and Technical University of Construction, Dongyang, 322100, China.
Guangyong PanSchool of Intelligent Manufacturing, Zhejiang Guangsha Vocational and Technical University of Construction, Dongyang, 322100, China. panguangyong0515@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary goal of bone tissue engineering is to restore and rejuvenate bone defects by using a suitable three-dimensional scaffold, appropriate cells, and growth hormones. Various scaffolding methods are used to fabricate three-dimensional scaffolds, which provide the necessary environment for cell activity and bone formation. Multiple materials may be used to create scaffolds with hierarchical structures that are optimal for cell growth and specialization. This study examines a notion for creating an optimal framework for bone regeneration using a combination of the robocasting method and the electrospinning approach. Research indicates that the integration of these two procedures enhances the benefits of each method and provides a rationale for addressing their shortcomings via this combination. The hybrid approach is anticipated to provide a manufactured scaffold that can effectively replace bone defects while possessing the necessary qualities for bone regeneration.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBone and BonesHumansOsteogenesis3D printingBone regenerationBone scaffoldsElectrospinningHierarchical scaffoldRobocasting

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.