Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38530469›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2024

Bats, Bacteria, and Bat Smell V.2.0: Repeatable Sex-Specific Differences in Scent Organ Microbiota.

Öncü Maraci, Anna Antonatou-Papaioannou, Sebastian Jünemann, Karin Schneeberger, Michael Schulze, Ingo Scheffler, Barbara A Caspers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bacterial Composition Across Bat Species: A Human Health Perspective.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Öncü MaraciDepartment of Behavioural Ecology, Bielefeld University, Konsequenz 45, 33619, Bielefeld, Germany. oncu.maraci@uni-bielefeld.de.
Anna Antonatou-PapaioannouEvolutionary Biology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstrasse 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Sebastian JünemannFaculty of Technology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstrasse 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Karin SchneebergerAnimal Ecology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Maulbeerallee 1, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.
Michael SchulzeAnimal Ecology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Maulbeerallee 1, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.
Ingo SchefflerEvolutionary Adaptive Genomics, Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24-26, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.
Barbara A CaspersDepartment of Behavioural Ecology, Bielefeld University, Konsequenz 45, 33619, Bielefeld, Germany.
University of Potsdam · DEBielefeld University · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DEUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHN 1584/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproducibility is a fundamental principle in science, ensuring reliable and valid findings. However, replication studies are scarce, particularly in ecology, due to the emphasis on novelty for publication. We explored the possibility of replicating original findings in the field of microbial and chemical ecology by conducting a conceptual replication of a previous study analysing the sex-specific differences in the microbial communities inhabiting the wing sacs, a scent organ with crucial functions in olfactory communication, of greater sac-winged bat (Saccopteryx bilineata). In the original study, the skin swabs from the antebrachial wing sacs of the males and wing sac rudiments of the females were analysed using culture-dependent methods to test sex-specific differences. The authors demonstrated that males have lower microbial richness and different microbial composition than females. We attempted to reproduce these findings using 16S rRNA sequencing, which offers improved accuracy in pinpointing microbial members than culture-dependent methods because of advanced statistical methods. Our study validated the original study's findings: Males had a lower microbial richness, and the community composition differed between the sexes. Furthermore, in the current study, males had an increased abundance of bacteria that might potentially be involved in odour production and degradation of malodorous substances and antimicrobial production. Our conceptual replication study corroborated that microbes can play a role in shaping their host's olfactory phenotype and consequently influence sexual selection. Furthermore, the current study emphasises the importance of replication efforts and hopefully encourages a culture that values replication studies in scientific practice.

Indexed as

ChiropteraMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaFemaleMaleOdorantsPheromonesReproducibility of ResultsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSmellPheromonesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SChemical signallingConceptual replicationGreater sac-winged batsOlfactory communicationScent gland microbiotaSex-specific microbiome

Identifiers

PMID38530469
PMCPMC10965658
OpenAlexW4393186897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.