Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38530451›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2024

The longitudinal follow-up of a newly proposed OCTA imaging finding (SSPiM) and the importance of it as a new biomarker for treatment response in diabetic macular edema.

Gülsüm Genç, Özge Yanık, Sibel Demirel, Figen Batioglu, Emin Özmert

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gülsüm GençDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3989-0720
Özge YanıkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1822-8703
Sibel DemirelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. drsibeldemireltr@yahoo.com.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6430-6565
Figen BatiogluDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5834-7512
Emin ÖzmertDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7561-5075
Ankara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the frequency of SSPiM (suspended scattering particles in motion), systemic risk factors, ocular findings, progression characteristics, and treatment response in diabetic retinopathy (DR) patients.

methodsIn this prospective study, a total of 109 eyes of 109 patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) were included. Demographic characteristics and systemic data of the patients were recorded. In addition to a detailed ophthalmological examination, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) imaging were performed. According to the OCTA images, the patients were divided into two categories: SSPiM detected (SSPiM +) and undetected (SSPiM -). The patients were followed up at 0, 3, and 6 months. Treatment responses at 6 months in treatment-administered patients with and without SSPiM were examined.

resultsThe frequency of SSPiM in DME cases was found to be 34.9%. No significant correlation was found between SSPiM and demographic characteristics, systemic, and biochemical parameters (p > 0.05). It was observed that SSPIM was most frequently localized in the outer nuclear layer adjacent to the outer plexiform (81.6%). SSPiM appearance disappeared in 7 (19.4%) of 36 patients with SSPiM who had regular follow-up for 6 months. In 4 (11.1%) of these seven patients, hard exudate plaques developed in the areas where SSPiM disappeared. Regarding treatment response at 6 months, the decrease in CMT was statistically significantly lower in the SSPiM group compared to cases without SSPiM.

conclusionSSPiM is a finding seen in approximately one-third of DME patients and may adversely affect the response to the treatment.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsDiabetic RetinopathyFluorescein AngiographyFundus OculiIntravitreal InjectionsMacular EdemaTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityAgedBiomarkersDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMacula LuteaMaleAngiogenesis InhibitorsBiomarkersDiabetic macular edemaHyperreflective fluidOCTA biomarkerOCT biomarkerOptical coherence tomography angiographySuspended scattering particles in motionTreatment resistance

Identifiers

PMID38530451
PMCPMC11271326
OpenAlexW4393193837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.