Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38530399›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2024

Improving predictions of compound amenability for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to enhance non-targeted analysis.

Nathaniel Charest, Charles N Lowe, Christian Ramsland, Brian Meyer, Vicente Samano, Antony J Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. CombinedJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathaniel CharestCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711, USA. charest.nathaniel@epa.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4252-0365
Charles N LoweCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9151-6157
Christian RamslandOakridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 37830, USA.
Brian MeyerSenior Environmental Employment Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711, USA.
Vicente SamanoSenior Environmental Employment Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711, USA.
Antony J WilliamsCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2668-4821

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass-spectrometry-based non-targeted analysis (NTA), in which mass spectrometric signals are assigned chemical identities based on a systematic collation of evidence, is a growing area of interest for toxicological risk assessment. Successful NTA results in better identification of potentially hazardous pollutants within the environment, facilitating the development of targeted analytical strategies to best characterize risks to human and ecological health. A supporting component of the NTA process involves assessing whether suspected chemicals are amenable to the mass spectrometric method, which is necessary in order to assign an observed signal to the chemical structure. Prior work from this group involved the development of a random forest model for predicting the amenability of 5517 unique chemical structures to liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). This work improves the interpretability of the group's prior model of the same endpoint, as well as integrating 1348 more data points across negative and positive ionization modes. We enhance interpretability by feature engineering, a machine learning practice that reduces the input dimensionality while attempting to preserve performance statistics. We emphasize the importance of interpretable machine learning models within the context of building confidence in NTA identification. The novel data were curated by the labeling of compounds as amenable or unamenable by expert curators, resulting in an enhanced set of chemical compounds to expand the applicability domain of the prior model. The balanced accuracy benchmark of the newly developed model is comparable to performance previously reported (mean CV BA is 0.84 vs. 0.82 in positive mode, and 0.85 vs. 0.82 in negative mode), while on a novel external set, derived from this work's data, the Matthews correlation coefficients (MCC) for the novel models are 0.66 and 0.68 for positive and negative mode, respectively. Our group's prior published models scored MCC of 0.55 and 0.54 on the same external sets. This demonstrates appreciable improvement over the chemical space captured by the expanded dataset. This work forms part of our ongoing efforts to develop models with higher interpretability and higher performance to support NTA efforts.

Indexed as

Mass spectrometryNon-targeted analysisPredictive modelingSuspect screening analysis

Identifiers

PMID38530399
PMCPMC11228616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.