Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38530309›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Primary Care Physicians' Satisfaction With Interoperable Health Information Technology.

Jordan Everson, Nathaniel Hendrix, Robert L Phillips, Julia Adler-Milstein, Andrew Bazemore, Vaishali Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Health interoperability across phenotypes of family physician practices.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Information-blocking trends following regulatory action.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. New indices to track interoperability among US hospitals.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  8. Barriers to obtaining and using interoperable information among non-federal acute care hospitals.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Primary Care Informatics: Vitalizing the Bedrock of Health Care.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jordan EversonOffice of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Washington, DC.
Nathaniel HendrixAmerican Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky.
Robert L PhillipsAmerican Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky.
Julia Adler-MilsteinDivision of Clinical Informatics and Digital Transformation, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Andrew BazemoreAmerican Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky.
Vaishali PatelOffice of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Washington, DC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Enabling widespread interoperability-the ability of health information technology systems to exchange information and to use that information without special effort-is a primary focus of public policy on health information technology. More information on clinicians' experience using that technology can serve as one measure of the impact of that policy. Objective: To assess primary care physician perspectives on the state of interoperability. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional survey of family medicine physicians in the US was conducted from December 12, 2021, to October 12, 2022. A sample of family medicine physicians who completed the Continuous Certification Questionnaire (CCQ), a required part of the American Board of Family Medicine certification process, which has a 100% response rate, were invited to participate. Main Outcomes and Measures: Eighteen items on the CCQ assessed experience accessing and using various information from outside organizations, including medications, immunizations, and allergies. Results: A total of 2088 physicians (1053 women [50%]; age reported categorically as either ≥50 years or <50 years) completed the CCQ interoperability questions in 2022. Of these respondents, 35% practiced in hospital or health system-owned practices, while 27% practiced in independently owned practices. Eleven percent were very satisfied with their ability to electronically access all 10 types of information from outside organizations included on the questionnaire, and a mean of 70% were at least somewhat satisfied. A total of 23% of family medicine physicians reported information from outside organizations was very easy to use, and an additional 65% reported that information was somewhat easy to use. Only 8% reported that information from different electronic health record (EHR) developers' products was very easy to use compared with 38% who reported information from the same EHR developer's product was very easy to use. Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study of family medicine physicians found modest and uneven improvement in physicians' experience with interoperability. These findings suggest that substantial heterogeneity in satisfaction by information type, source of information, EHR, practice type, ownership, and patient population necessitates diverse policy and strategies to improve interoperability.

Indexed as

Physicians, Primary CareCertificationCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPersonal Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID38530309
PMCPMC10966410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.