Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Muhammad Moman KhanInstitute for Biotechnology, Brandenburg University of Technology (BTU) Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4493-1563
Katarzyna SidorczukDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genomics, Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6576-9054
Juliane BeckerInstitute for Biotechnology, Brandenburg University of Technology (BTU) Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany.
Adrianna AleksandrowiczDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.
Karolina BaraniewiczDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.
Christina LudwigBavarian Center for Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry (BayBioMS), School of Life Sciences, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Aamir AliNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering College, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (NIBGE-C, PIEAS), Faisalabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-8433-4328
Robert A KingsleyQuadram Institute Biosciences, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0194-6485
Peter SchierackInstitute for Biotechnology, Brandenburg University of Technology (BTU) Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6445-3506
Rafał KolendaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8145-579X
Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg · DEUniversity of Wrocław · PLWrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences · PLNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering · PKNorwich Research Park · GBTechnical University of Munich · DE
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: The study explores a biofilm-like clumpy adhesion phenotype in
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Characterization of clumpy adhesion of · full record | OpenQuestion