Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38529901›Full record

ArticleMicrobial genomics2024

Assembly collapsing versus heterozygosity oversizing: detection of homokaryotic and heterokaryotic

Rodolfo Enrique Ángeles-Argáiz, Luis Fernando Lozano Aguirre-Beltrán, Diana Hernández-Oaxaca, Christian Quintero-Corrales, Mauricio A Trujillo-Roldán, Santiago Castillo-Ramírez, Roberto Garibay-Orijel

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly and Annotation of theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Systematic study ofIMA fungus · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rodolfo Enrique Ángeles-ArgáizPosgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito de los Posgrados s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México, C.P. 04510, Mexico.
Luis Fernando Lozano Aguirre-BeltránCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad s/n, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México, C.P. 62210, Mexico.
Diana Hernández-OaxacaCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad s/n, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México, C.P. 62210, Mexico.
Christian Quintero-CorralesPosgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito de los Posgrados s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México, C.P. 04510, Mexico.
Mauricio A Trujillo-RoldánInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer Circuito s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México, C.P. 04510, Mexico.
Santiago Castillo-RamírezCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad s/n, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México, C.P. 62210, Mexico.
Roberto Garibay-OrijelInstituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer Circuito s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México, C.P. 04510, Mexico.
Instituto de Ecología · MXUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversidad Autónoma de Baja California · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome assembly and annotation using short-paired reads is challenging for eukaryotic organisms due to their large size, variable ploidy and large number of repetitive elements. However, the use of single-molecule long reads improves assembly quality (completeness and contiguity), but haplotype duplications still pose assembly challenges. To address the effect of read length on genome assembly quality, gene prediction and annotation, we compared genome assemblers and sequencing technologies with four strains of the ectomycorrhizal fungus

Indexed as

GenomeLaccariaRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidHaplotypesSequence Analysis, DNAbiotrophic fungal genomeheterokaryotic fungal genomehybrid genome assemblyintraspecific genome variabilityNGS comparison

Identifiers

PMID38529901
PMCPMC10995626
OpenAlexW4393192489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.