ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2024
Unsupervised Denoising and Super-Resolution of Vascular Flow Data by Physics-Informed Machine Learning.
Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physics-informed neural networks for physiological signal processing and modeling: a narrative review.Physiological measurement · 2025Review
- Generalized Super-Resolution 4D Flow MRI - Using Ensemble Learning to Extend Across the Cardiovascular System.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present an unsupervised deep learning method to perform flow denoising and super-resolution without high-resolution labels. We demonstrate the ability of a single model to reconstruct three-dimensional stenosis and aneurysm flows, with varying geometries, orientations, and boundary conditions. Ground truth data was generated using computational fluid dynamics, and then corrupted with multiplicative Gaussian noise. Auto-encoders were used to compress the representations of the flow domain geometry and the (possibly noisy and low-resolution) flow field. These representations were used to condition a physics-informed neural network. A physics-based loss was implemented to train the model to recover lost information from the noisy input by transforming the flow to a solution of the Navier-Stokes equations. Our experiments achieved mean squared errors in the true flow reconstruction of O(1.0 × 10-4), and root mean squared residuals of O(1.0 × 10-2) for the momentum and continuity equations. Our method yielded correlation coefficients of 0.971 for the hidden pressure field and 0.82 for the derived wall shear stress field. By performing point-wise predictions of the flow, the model was able to robustly denoise and super-resolve the field to 20× the input resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.