ArticleThe clinical respiratory journal2024
Value of rapid on-site evaluation combined with interventional pulmonology techniques in the diagnosis of pulmonary cryptococcosis.
Article in The clinical respiratory journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improved Etiological Diagnosis of Nonresolving or Slowly Resolving Pneumonia Through Combined Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy and Metagenomic Sequencing.Canadian respiratory journal · 2025Trial
- The diagnostic efficacy of bronchoscopy guided by hand-drawn mapping in the diagnosis of initial treatment for sputum-smear negative peripheral pulmonary tuberculosis.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2026Article
- Value of rapid on-site evaluation combined with interventional pulmonology techniques in the diagnosis of pulmonary cryptococcosis.The clinical respiratory journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) combined with computed tomography-guided percutaneous needle biopsy (CT-PNB) or radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy (EBUS-TBLB) for pulmonary cryptococcosis (PC).
methodsClinical data of 33 patients diagnosed with PC at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between February 2018 and June 2023 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into the CT-PNB and EBUS-TBLB groups based on the intervention method, and the diagnostic positivity rate and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.
resultsCompared with the final diagnosis, the positive diagnostic rates of ROSE, histopathology and serum CrAg of all patients were 81.8% (27/33), 72.7% (24/33) and 63.6% (21/33), respectively. The average turnaround times of the three methods were 0.1 (0.1-0.2) h, 96.0 (48.0-120.0) h and 7.8 (4.5-13.6) h, respectively (P < 0.001). The coincidence rate between histopathology and ROSE was 84.8% with a kappa value of 0.574. The positive diagnostic rate for PC was significantly higher in the CT-PNB group than in the EBUS-TBLB group (92.9% vs. 57.9%), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Combined with the ROSE results, the positive diagnostic rate in the EBUS-TBLB group increased to 84.2% (16/19).
conclusionROSE has commendable accuracy and timeliness, and CT-PNB offers further advantages in this regard. ROSE enhances the diagnostic efficiency of EBUS-TBLB for PC and is safe and effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.