Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38529515›Full record

ArticleDEN open2024

Development and validation of a practical clinical risk prediction model for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.

Zhao Wu Meng, Yibing Ruan, Stacey Fisher, Kirles Bishay, Millie Chau, Megan Howarth, Shane Cartwright, Yen-I Chen, Elijah Dixon, Steven J Heitman and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DEN open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Predictive models for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zhao Wu MengDepartment of Community Health Sciences University of Calgary Calgary Canada.
Yibing RuanDepartment of Oncology Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Canada.
Stacey FisherOttawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Canada.
Kirles BishayDepartment of Community Health Sciences University of Calgary Calgary Canada.
Millie ChauDepartment of Medicine Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Calgary Calgary Canada.
Megan HowarthDepartment of Medicine Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Calgary Calgary Canada.
Shane CartwrightDepartment of Medicine Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Calgary Calgary Canada.
Yen-I ChenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology McGill University Health Centre Montreal Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5704-2226
Elijah DixonDepartment of Community Health Sciences University of Calgary Calgary Canada.
Steven J HeitmanDepartment of Community Health Sciences University of Calgary Calgary Canada.
Darren R BrennerDepartment of Community Health Sciences University of Calgary Calgary Canada.
Nauzer ForbesDepartment of Community Health Sciences University of Calgary Calgary Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6966-3908

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to develop an accurate post-ERCP pancreatitis risk prediction model using easily obtainable variables. Methods: Using prospective multi-center ERCP data, we performed logistic regression using stepwise selection on several patient-, procedure-, and endoscopist-related factors that were determined a priori. The final model was based on a combination of the Bayesian information criterion and Akaike's information criterion performance, balancing the inclusion of clinically relevant variables and model parsimony. All available data were used for model development, with subsequent internal validation performed on bootstrapped data using 10-fold cross-validation. Results: Data from 3021 ERCPs were used to inform models. There were 151 cases of post-ERCP pancreatitis (5.0% incidence). Variables included in the final model included female sex, pancreatic duct cannulation, native papilla status, pre-cut sphincterotomy, increasing cannulation time, presence of biliary stricture, patient age, and placement of a pancreatic duct stent. The final model was discriminating, with a receiver operating characteristic curve statistic of 0.79, and well-calibrated, with a predicted risk-to-observed risk ratio of 1.003. Conclusions: We successfully developed and internally validated a promising post-ERCP pancreatitis clinical prediction model using easily obtainable variables that are known at baseline or observed during the ERCP procedure. The model achieved an area under the curve of 0.79. External validation is planned as additional data becomes available.

Indexed as

adverse eventendoscopyERCPpancreatitisprediction

Identifiers

PMID38529515
PMCPMC10962486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.