Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38529376›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

The application of artificial intelligence for Rapid On-Site Evaluation during flexible bronchoscopy.

Shuang Yan, Yongfei Li, Lei Pan, Hua Jiang, Li Gong, Faguang Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Artificial intelligence in bronchoscopy: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Pulmonology.Therapeutic advances in pulmonary and critical care medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shuang Yan *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Yongfei Li *Xi'an High-tech Institute, Xi'an, China.
Lei PanDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Hua JiangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Li GongDepartment of Pathology, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Faguang JinDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) during flexible bronchoscopy (FB) can improve the adequacy of biopsy specimens and diagnostic yield of lung cancer. However, the lack of cytopathologists has restricted the wide use of ROSE. Objective: To develop a ROSE artificial intelligence (AI) system using deep learning techniques to differentiate malignant from benign lesions based on ROSE cytological images, and evaluate the clinical performance of the ROSE AI system. Method: 6357 ROSE cytological images from 721 patients who underwent transbronchial biopsy were collected from January to July 2023 at the Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University. A ROSE AI system, composed of a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN), was developed to identify whether there were malignant cells in the ROSE cytological images. Internal testing, external testing, and human-machine competition were used to evaluate the performance of the system. Results: The ROSE AI system identified images containing lung malignant cells with the accuracy of 92.97% and 90.26% on the internal testing dataset and external testing dataset respectively, and its performance was comparable to that of the experienced cytopathologist. The ROSE AI system also showed promising performance in diagnosing lung cancer based on ROSE cytological images, with accuracy of 89.61% and 87.59%, and sensitivity of 90.57% and 94.90% on the internal testing dataset and external testing dataset respectively. More specifically, the agreement between the ROSE AI system and the experienced cytopathologist in diagnosing common types of lung cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and small cell lung cancer, demonstrated almost perfect consistency in both the internal testing dataset (κ Conclusions: The ROSE AI system demonstrated feasibility and robustness in identifying specimen adequacy, showing potential enhancement in the diagnostic yield of FB. Nevertheless, additional enhancements, incorporating a more diverse range of training data and leveraging advanced AI models with increased capabilities, along with rigorous validation through extensive multi-center randomized control assays, are crucial to guarantee the seamless and effective integration of this technology into clinical practice.

Indexed as

deep convolutional neural networkflexible bronchoscopylung cancerrapid on-site evaluationtransbronchial biopsy

Identifiers

PMID38529376
PMCPMC10961380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.