ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
The application of artificial intelligence for Rapid On-Site Evaluation during flexible bronchoscopy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in bronchoscopy: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence and digital health in bronchoscopy: advances in diagnostic accuracy, real-time navigation and procedural skills training.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Review
- Review
- Recent advances in artificial intelligence across interventional pulmonology: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Machine Learning Predicts Adequacy of Rapid On-site Evaluation in Fine Needle Aspirations in Lung Cancer Cytology.The American journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Large Language Models Utility for Rapid On-Site Evaluation in Interventional Pulmonology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Bronchoscopy: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Review
- Approach to mediastinal cytopathology: a diagnostic overview.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2026Review
- Reliability of Rapid On-Site Evaluation Achieved by Remote Sharing Systems (E-ROSE) and AI Algorithms (AI-ROSE) Compared With the Gold Standard in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2025Article
- Clinical application of rapid on-site evaluation of technology for the diagnosis of respiratory system tumors: a retrospective study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Review
- Contemporary Concise Review 2024: New Techniques in Interventional Pulmonology.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2025Review
- Current landscape and emerging opportunities for using telecytology for rapid on-site assessment in cytopathology.Cancer cytopathology · 2025Review
- Article
- Challenges and Opportunities in Cytopathology Artificial Intelligence.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of rapid on-site evaluation in subtyping lung cancer via bronchoscopic biopsy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Automatic lung cancer subtyping using rapid on-site evaluation slides and serum biological markers.Respiratory research · 2024Article
- Diagnostic modalities in the mediastinum and the role of bronchoscopy in mediastinal assessment: a narrative review.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Pulmonology.Therapeutic advances in pulmonary and critical care medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) during flexible bronchoscopy (FB) can improve the adequacy of biopsy specimens and diagnostic yield of lung cancer. However, the lack of cytopathologists has restricted the wide use of ROSE. Objective: To develop a ROSE artificial intelligence (AI) system using deep learning techniques to differentiate malignant from benign lesions based on ROSE cytological images, and evaluate the clinical performance of the ROSE AI system. Method: 6357 ROSE cytological images from 721 patients who underwent transbronchial biopsy were collected from January to July 2023 at the Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University. A ROSE AI system, composed of a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN), was developed to identify whether there were malignant cells in the ROSE cytological images. Internal testing, external testing, and human-machine competition were used to evaluate the performance of the system. Results: The ROSE AI system identified images containing lung malignant cells with the accuracy of 92.97% and 90.26% on the internal testing dataset and external testing dataset respectively, and its performance was comparable to that of the experienced cytopathologist. The ROSE AI system also showed promising performance in diagnosing lung cancer based on ROSE cytological images, with accuracy of 89.61% and 87.59%, and sensitivity of 90.57% and 94.90% on the internal testing dataset and external testing dataset respectively. More specifically, the agreement between the ROSE AI system and the experienced cytopathologist in diagnosing common types of lung cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and small cell lung cancer, demonstrated almost perfect consistency in both the internal testing dataset (κ Conclusions: The ROSE AI system demonstrated feasibility and robustness in identifying specimen adequacy, showing potential enhancement in the diagnostic yield of FB. Nevertheless, additional enhancements, incorporating a more diverse range of training data and leveraging advanced AI models with increased capabilities, along with rigorous validation through extensive multi-center randomized control assays, are crucial to guarantee the seamless and effective integration of this technology into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.