Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38529367›Full record

ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2023

Democratizing Pathological Image Segmentation with Lay Annotators via Molecular-empowered Learning.

Ruining Deng, Yanwei Li, Peize Li, Jiacheng Wang, Lucas W Remedios, Saydolimkhon Agzamkhodjaev, Zuhayr Asad, Quan Liu, Can Cui, Yaohong Wang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. HATs: Hierarchical Adaptive Taxonomy Segmentation for Panoramic Pathology Image Analysis.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2024
    Article
  4. PrPSeg: Universal Proposition Learning for Panoramic Renal Pathology Segmentation.Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ruining DengVanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37215, USA.
Yanwei LiVanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37215, USA.
Peize LiVanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37215, USA.
Jiacheng WangVanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37215, USA.
Lucas W RemediosVanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37215, USA.
Saydolimkhon AgzamkhodjaevVanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37215, USA.
Zuhayr AsadVanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37215, USA.
Quan LiuVanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37215, USA.
Can CuiVanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37215, USA.
Yaohong WangVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville TN 37232, USA.
Yihan WangVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville TN 37232, USA.
Yucheng TangNVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara and Bethesda, USA.
Haichun YangVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville TN 37232, USA.
Yuankai HuoVanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37215, USA.

Funding

RESOLUTION OF GLOMERULOSCLEROSISR01DK056942 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI FOGO, AGNES B. · 2001 to 2021
$4.9M
AI-empowered 3D Computer Vision and Image-Omics Integration for Digital Kidney HistopathologyR01DK135597 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Yuankai Huo · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK056942NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK135597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-class cell segmentation in high-resolution Giga-pixel whole slide images (WSI) is critical for various clinical applications. Training such an AI model typically requires labor-intensive pixel-wise manual annotation from experienced domain experts (e.g., pathologists). Moreover, such annotation is error-prone when differentiating fine-grained cell types (e.g., podocyte and mesangial cells) via the naked human eye. In this study, we assess the feasibility of democratizing pathological AI deployment by only using lay annotators (annotators without medical domain knowledge). The contribution of this paper is threefold: (1) We proposed a molecular-empowered learning scheme for multi-class cell segmentation using partial labels from lay annotators; (2) The proposed method integrated Giga-pixel level molecular-morphology cross-modality registration, molecular-informed annotation, and molecular-oriented segmentation model, so as to achieve significantly superior performance via 3 lay annotators as compared with 2 experienced pathologists; (3) A deep corrective learning (learning with imperfect label) method is proposed to further improve the segmentation performance using partially annotated noisy data. From the experimental results, our learning method achieved F1 = 0.8496 using molecular-informed annotations from lay annotators, which is better than conventional morphology-based annotations (F1 = 0.7015) from experienced pathologists. Our method democratizes the development of a pathological segmentation deep model to the lay annotator level, which consequently scales up the learning process similar to a non-medical computer vision task. The official implementation and cell annotations are publicly available at https://github.com/hrlblab/MolecularEL.

Indexed as

Image annotationNoisy label learningPathologyRegistration

Identifiers

PMID38529367
PMCPMC10961594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.