Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38529340›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2024

Modified technique improves efficacy for in-office posterior nasal nerve ablation.

Daniel Gorelik, Aatin K Dhanda, Alexander Choi, Masayoshi Takashima, Najm S Khan, Nicholas R Rowan, Aria Jafari, Tariq Syed, Omar G Ahmed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Blue laser turbinate reduction with vs. without posterior nasal neurolysis for refractory rhinitis: a retrospective comparative study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel GorelikDivision of Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Houston Methodist Hospital Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7998-6949
Aatin K DhandaRutgers New Jersey Medical School Newark New Jersey USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8926-7662
Alexander ChoiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA.
Masayoshi TakashimaDivision of Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Houston Methodist Hospital Houston Texas USA.
Najm S KhanDivision of Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Houston Methodist Hospital Houston Texas USA.
Nicholas R RowanDivision of Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1296-2648
Aria JafariDivision of Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5254-3221
Tariq SyedDivision of Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Houston Methodist Hospital Houston Texas USA.
Omar G AhmedDivision of Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Houston Methodist Hospital Houston Texas USA.
Methodist Hospital · USBaylor College of Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Posterior nasal nerve (PNN) ablation is a minimally invasive treatment option for patients with chronic rhinitis. Recent evidence shows that parasympathetic innervation of the nasal cavity is more extensive and there are many fibers posterior to the lateral attachment of the middle turbinate. We describe a modified ablative technique that targets the extensive innervation of the posterior nasal nerves. Methods: Description of the technique and retrospective cohort analysis. In addition to the traditional radiofrequency and cryoablation targets, three additional treatment sites posterior to the middle turbinate were targeted using radiofrequency ablation, as well as one focused treatment posteroinferior to the middle turbinate attachment using cryotherapy ablation. The primary outcome collected was a 30% improvement in overall rhinitis symptoms. Results: Forty-five patients received treatment and completed 3-month follow-up using the modified technique for radiofrequency and cryotherapy PNN ablation. Previously, our institution documented a 64.5% responder rate at 3 months. After introducing the modified technique, the response rate at 3 months significantly improved (64.5% vs. 91.1%, Conclusions: This report suggests improved efficacy with implementation of the modified technique for in-office PNN ablation. Given the extensive nature of the post-ganglionic parasympathetic fibers of the nasal cavity which often emerge posterior to the middle turbinate attachment, a modified technique to target these branches should be considered. Prospective randomized studies comparing this modified technique to the traditional technique are needed. Level of Evidence: III.

Indexed as

chronic rhinitiscryotherapymiddle turbinate anatomyposterior nasal nerve ablationradiofrequency therapy

Identifiers

PMID38529340
PMCPMC10961994
OpenAlexW4393160444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.